sndmn11
"DADDY"
*Thin*?The “hunting” Bergers are just the original think jacket .
*Thin*?The “hunting” Bergers are just the original think jacket .
I think this is huge. I see this all the time on Facebook groups. People kill (kill!) stuff with ELD-Xs then complain because they didn't make a pretty mushroom like a Barnes TTSX at 50 yards. Then say they will never use them again because they didn't work. All the while talking about an animal that virtually dropped in its tracks. WTF?! The lack of critical reasoning skills in the general populace today is appalling.I think it is expecting something that won't happen. I quoted someone who said they saw "pinholes" with them and seemed to write in a disappointed manner. They break apart and cause a lot of damage; anything that exits will be a tiny hole that probably won't be noticed or assumed to be a bullet that didn't expand. If I am expecting to catch an intact mushroomed slug anything else is probably viewed as a failure despite a dead something. When folks see that "failure" and then remember they or someone they knew didn't recover an animal at some point with that bullet, they assume that the bullet sucked rather than the shot placement.
Exactly. This always cracks me up. “I wasn’t impressed with how the bullet performed, there was core/jacket separation, we didn’t find much of the bullet” as we field dressed the animal. Seriously? WTF? Just a sign of group think and our society these days.I think this is huge. I see this all the time on Facebook groups. People kill (kill!) stuff with ELD-Xs then complain because they didn't make a pretty mushroom like a Barnes TTSX at 50 yards. Then say they will never use them again because they didn't work. All the while talking about an animal that virtually dropped in its tracks. WTF?! The lack of critical reasoning skills in the general populace today is appalling.
Yeah but hit a deer below the knee it still won’t kill him
Yeah I’m a noobProbably keep them bleeding tho....
Ah damn, you probably ain't been around long enough to get that.
Yeah I’m a noob
Ahh yeah I know about this story but damn 100 pages…deff not gonna check all of themKeep you busy a minute or 2.
Thread 'Aram Von Benedikt' https://rokslide.com/forums/threads/aram-von-benedikt.332352/
Ahh yeah I know about this story but damn 100 pages…deff not gonna check all of them
You right them some good ones…I’ve actually had this happen to me before….Missing out.
Lotta meme work in there.
You right them some good ones…I’ve actually had this happen to me before….
Missing out.
Lotta meme work in there.
Aram would disagree…Yeah but hit a deer below the knee it still won’t kill him
Bastard. Go milk a cow and give some of us others a chance!Probably keep them bleeding tho....
Ah damn, you probably ain't been around long enough to get that.
This has been my experience as well. 280AI, 168gr VLD. The rifle has killed probably 20 elk and deer combined plus a couple antelope and a lot of smaller critters. Almost every animal dropped in its tracks and we haven’t had to track a single animal. Shots from 20-400 yards on big game animals.I have never lost an animal that was hit with 168gr VLD-H. Well over 50 animals from antelope to moose.
Not true. An outfitter I have used in Wyoming for elk bans Nosler ballistic tips (it is on their website). The weird thing is the guides use Bergers in their rifles. It didn't matter to me because my wife and I use accubonds for elk.Fake News….this thread is entertaining cause there’s so much submitted evidence discrediting the original claim…..An Oufiitter would most likely never ban a specific bullet. They would simply have a hair or blood clause in their contract.