@EuroOptic tell NF to stick this reticle in the 2-12.I was hoping for the fc-mil reticle from the nx8 1-8 to be offered in the 2-12 or 3-18.View attachment 1003555

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@EuroOptic tell NF to stick this reticle in the 2-12.I was hoping for the fc-mil reticle from the nx8 1-8 to be offered in the 2-12 or 3-18.View attachment 1003555

I'm pleading ignorance here. Which embargo and how does it impact this? I'm not saying it doesn't. I'm just saying I'm not following you. I will admit to rarely looking at political news with the riflescope trade in mind.I guess the embargo date and time don’t mean crap to people.
I'm with you
Everyone seems to want a reticle that Bubbles can see in the dark, I personally feel the glass quality is the low light limiting factor.
View attachment 1003549
They have refused every effort to do a correct reticle. At this point it is almost purposeful, willful refusal.
I see that it's going to be pretty much the only duplex style reticle, if I'm reading it correctly. I would have thought their 3-10 forceplex scopes would be good in the hunting world.I have actually been asking NF for a 4a type reticle which is a good fit for a lot of my hunting which isn't beyond 400 yards.
Then I'm at a loss as to why you can't grasp the problem here. Because at the end of the day a scope that was visible in low light timber out there, while also being workable when you do see that elk at 537 yards on snow, would do what I want here.I'm pretty familiar with hunting "out west". I live and hunt "out west".
100 yard bench rest guys?who is the customer for the FVR-1 reticle in the 6-36?
"with the new Fine Varmint Reticle (FVR-1™)" I would have to assume varminters, but I don't see who's asking for it. Didn't NF start out as a varmint scope company? One of you with better reticle ideas should get a job at NF.who is the customer for the FVR-1 reticle in the 6-36?
Well, here's what I can say. I've lived and hunted here my whole life. I hunt a huge variety of public land mountainous terrain and I've been fortunate to be more successful than most. I know what it's like to shoot an elk at >1000 yards on a wide open snow covered ridge top in the sunlight and I know what it's like to shoot an elk in fading light at close range in the timber. What I will say is that I have never missed out on an opportunity at a harvest due to my reticle being "unusable" as you call it.Then I'm at a loss as to why you can't grasp the problem here. Because at the end of the day a scope that was visible in low light timber out there, while also being workable when you do see that elk at 537 yards on snow, would do what I want here.
I've stated what I believe that I need - enough times to frankly be obnoxious, I will admit, because I want to be heard on this and have wanted that for quite a long time - and I have stated what it would take to make it. I'm not advocating for some unreachable goal that I refuse to define.
Well, one way to look at it is that if the Unknown scope works out, it will have a lot more support and less market dilution from people buying NX6’s.
Problem with this one according to all the gas gun guys is donut too small/fat (2 mil from recollection) and dot too big for when going to precision side of mag range...so they came out with the dmx version. Opened up the donut to 4 mil and made the center dot smaller. Much better. The donut gets out of the way nicely as mag goes up and fine aiming is not a problem for center dot now reasonable and not covering the kill zone etc.I was hoping for the fc-mil reticle from the nx8 1-8 to be offered in the 2-12 or 3-18.View attachment 1003555
I'm pleading ignorance here. Which embargo and how does it impact this? I'm not saying it doesn't. I'm just saying I'm not following you. I will admit to rarely looking at political news with the riflescope trade in mind.