Yes…..it’s actually 12.75”
This video from Ruger shows the stock without a spacer-
Yes…..it’s actually 12.75”
I put zero amount of confidence in anything technical he talks about.So ruger measures their barrel lengths differently across their product lines ? Doubt
Just a perspective that you can take or leave. I went down the route of wanting a 204 but decided on a 5.56/223 a few years ago. I made a reduced load 223 with H4895 and 40 gr vmax. It has the power of slightly less than 22 hornet maybe even closer to a 22 mag but with better BC than either. Of course if you don't reload....Any one got inside info on left hand in future? I called customer service and emailed and got the same answer they will not know until after they are released. someone at ruger must know. I assume if these are the same receiver as the gen 1 at some point they will offer in left hand. I don't think it be in the caliber I want 204 Ruger, But they might come out with a 223.
Looking at the action, why does it need a protruding magazine?Got mine today finally from my FFL. The action is NOTICEABLY better than a gen 1. I’ve got a gen 1 ranch on hand which has taken a few deer and been racked a bunch to try to smooth it out - and even lubed up it still is worse than the gen 2 with no lube. In fact the gen 1 still sounds very “zipper” like most times. My FFL actually ordered himself a 300 blackout ranch after getting to mess around with mine a bit.
I need to slap a scope on and get to the range. I think if it shoots like my gen 1s it’s going to be a great option. I’ll be keeping an eye on the LA versions (6.5 prc and 7PRC) in the future.
for the ranch version or the regular with AICS magwell?Looking at the action, why does it need a protruding magazine?
I thought all gen 2 had protruding magazine, but I'm only interested in the regular.for the ranch version or the regular with AICS magwell?
Yeah they switched from the flush rotary magazine to an AICS compatible. Not sure why the three round doesn’t sit flush or if something like the MDT mag would sit flush? I don’t have one on hand- I should have clarified that I picked up a ranch in 556I thought all gen 2 had protruding magazine, but I'm only interested in the regular.
I have all the ranch and predator versions I'll probably ever buy.
That’s a killer deal. That’s $100 less than I paid all out the doorJust picked up a Ranch in 5.56 for $515 plus tax and background.
Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk
It's already a negative comb. Flipping it around will give you the opposite effect.Hate to be a redneck but what are the odds you can flip the stock extension over and end up with a higher stock ala redneck jimmy rigged rokstock.
I think ajsomp means flipping the part with the butt pad, not the part with the cheek piece.