Not to sound like a dick, but most people are lazy and that's why they don't kill elk..I am sure your buddy scouts and spends time there. Most NR that come in the day before will probably not be as lucky. The north part of the unit gets crowded. It has the Gila and AZ bulls so there is a chance a at a monster.
In 16B/22 first archery I see that there were 586 resident applicants with 189 drawing tags. My public math isn't the greatest but that's around %32.I guess I don't understand your comment. 16B/C had over 50% chance to draw the early September archery tag last year for residents. 16E both Newberg and Jacobsen have shot archery bulls on public, so it's clearly doable there. One of those northern units had 2 really nice bulls shot and the video posted on YouTube last year, and that was on public. The 34 tag is a December archery tag but that's better than not hunting especially considering there aren't any bonus points you have to burn and there's some monster bulls. To each their own but I'd take every one of those options over hunting coyotes and hiking.
I'm not sure I want to admit this or if its even kosher to ask in a setting like this, but is (B) in the Gila that much harder to hunt?
I've always skipped applying there just reading how steep it is and that horses/outfitters are recommended.
Draw odds are better, harvest rates go down though.
In 16B/22 first archery I see that there were 586 resident applicants with 189 drawing tags. My public math isn't the greatest but that's around %32.
I researched on Toprut, don't have a membership but did the '18 draw data available. I've never given the group application any thought but their odds calculator for units I've drawn show a 30% increase in draw probability over my simple math. Would love to see their app with the NM data set that they use.If only NM's draw was that simpleWhen they look at every applicant's first three choices before moving on to the next applicant it's not as simple as dividing one number by another. If you're interested in how to calculate NM draw odds there's some articles out there, but none of them will give you their full method that I've seen.
goHUNT had last year as 57% odds for residents with the number of applicants and tags that you stated. I don't have a membership to toprut but for free they'll tell you 2018 draw odds, which were 52% for the early archery'
I drew a 4% unit 3rd choice in 2019..Using the number of tags available and the number of people who applied gives you the lowest possible draw odds for a unit. Those would only be accurate odds if every single person who applied for that unit put it as their first choice. That doesn't take into account how many people drew another tag in a previous choice in another unit and weren't really in the draw for that unit.
I have always looked at it like this, if its a really good unit who a lot of people are going to have as their first choice, that's probably pretty accurate. Where as a lesser unit where people are going to be putting it as their 3rd choice, your odds are going to be higher than that number due to other people drawing tags that were their 1st or 2nd choice.
Anything is possible in New Mexico! Thats the awesome part of them looking at all of your choices when your application comes up. I think it is safe to assume you had a pretty low random number assigned to your app if you drew that popular of a tag as a 3rd choice.I drew a 4% unit 3rd choice in 2019..
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
I am using NM G&F drawing odds for 2020. Not goHUNT.Really? Seems to me that there's well over a few dozen elk tags that are greater than 50% draw odds for a resident, and countless deer tags as well. A good number of those tags have over a 30% success rate, too. Unless goHUNT and toprut are lying to us.
Those are not the draw odds. Those are the draw statistics. There's a significant difference. New Mexico needs to rename that document.I am using NM G&F drawing odds for 2020. Not goHUNT.
That is correct. You need to calculate your own odds using the statistics. There are areas opening up that have not been open before. And in some areas the number of tags have been reduced. The only way I have found to track these things is the Wildlife Commision meeting minutes.Those are not the draw odds. Those are the draw statistics. There's a significant difference. New Mexico needs to rename that document.
Been looking this over since I saw your post. These are a goldmine of interesting information. Thanks for bringing it to my attention! For anyone else interested: http://www.wildlife.state.nm.us/commission/meeting-agendas/The only way I have found to track these things is the Wildlife Commision meeting minutes.
Yes I agree, anything is possible as it is truly luck of the draw. What data do you think would change the odds? To me, the odds are, x number of applications for y tags given. What else is there? I am happy to listen and entertain all theories. I am only looking at the 84% resident numbers and ignoring the 10% pool and combination of 10% that includes residents that use an outfitter. I suspect that number for residents is very small and meaningless to the overall odds. Also I have rounded to full percentages.Anything is possible in New Mexico! Thats the awesome part of them looking at all of your choices when your application comes up. I think it is safe to assume you had a pretty low random number assigned to your app if you drew that popular of a tag as a 3rd choice.
The point I was trying to make is that using the number of total applicants and number of available tags does not give you accurate odds. It gives you the worst case scenario.
Thank you. I appreciate you welcoming sentiment.Off to a great start here......
I am using NM G&F drawing odds for 2020. Not goHUNT.