Here's my long answer...
A telescoping pole should be stonger than a single piece carbon pole because where the poles slide in/out from each other you have app. double the carbon tubing thickness, making it harder to bend the pole at the overlapping point. And not all carbon fiber poles are created equally. I can't speak to how thick/thin other companies make their carbon fiber tubing, but the options for how they are engineered are vast, and there are two different ways carbon fiber can be made into a "roll" that have significant impacts on the amount of torsional force, i.e. flex, that it can withstand. We use a roll-wrapped process, which allows for a lot more flex, but if you get a "pultrusion" carbon tubing in a pole, they will break a lot easier (i.e. cheap carbon fiber costco poles) as this type of carbon tubing cannot withstand as much flex. No way to know as a consumer other than to ask the manufacturer. And the variation on carbon tubing quality is signficant when you compare a very cheap carbon pole to something like our poles.
So, the strength starts with the carbon fiber itself, the way it is manufactured, and the carbon tubing thickness. Our poles are different in that we designed the pole sections to withstand a lot of force for when you are packing out a heavy load by making them thicker, using a very high quality fiber, and a roll-wrapped process. Most companies are not anticipating their customers putting 100+ pound on their backs and expecting or needing a trekking pole that strong. Second, our SnapLocks, or where the carbon fiber sections overlap, have a fair amount of overlap in the pole sections, and as long as you don't go beyond the orange "STOP" when extending the legs, they have a lot of strength built in. The way a telescoping style pole can become compromised is if you over tighten the locking mechanism, which can collapse the carbon fiber tube. So as long as you don't over tighten (this is fairly easy to avoid), there isn't a downside to a telescoping pole from a strenght persepective.
We did a lot of testing with both our poles, both in the lab and in the field. IMO, you have to do both. Not sure what to say other than we spent 2 years testing and refining the product to get it to where it is today.
To your last question on whether or not this is a "me to" product. I would stack our poles up against any other brand in terms of strength and quality as a stand alone set of trekking poles, but the real innovation for us is in the grip and attachments. Hope that helps.