Nick Muche
WKR
Kicking the can down the road, an arbitrary rule change that will do nothing for the sheep. Go figure.
The 1:4 will have little effect on things, other than for maybe a very small group of hardcore non resident sheep hunters that like to hunt Alaska frequently. I am not sure what the rationale behind the 1:4 move is, but it passed. As far as the 40% non resident harvest goes, many residents do take issue with that. Not saying I am one of them, but many do feel that non residents take too big of a slice of the pie.
They approved the early season Youth Sheep hunt.
Interesting twist on that. 207 won't apply to the early season, so in theory the youth could air scout to their hearts content. Going to bring some supercub owners out to play.
There were proposals to limit residents as well, but thankfully, those did not pass. When a game population gets to the point that allocation needs to be limited, it should be the non residents that get limited first.
Notably, it was the Alaska Professional Hunters Association that proposed the 1 in 4 limits for non residents.
I would like to take one ram in my lifetime and residents expect one every year....
1:4 for residents would have similar results as the NR restrictions. Very few residents kill more than 1 sheep in 4 years... like 4-5%. About 60-65% of resident hunters each year are virgin sheep hunters. 80% of all resides will never kill a sheep, nor hunt them again.
Always interesting to read informed opinions on these topics.
The increased NR success rate is largely due to being guided, yes? Seems like cutting those numbers would sort things out cleanly, though I assume $$ makes that unlikely. The NR guided mandate remains hard to swallow, as the stated rationale is so obviously ridiculous.
I would like to take one ram in my lifetime and residents expect one every year....
Well, that's a numbers game since the sheep populations in those states, combined are probably less than Alaska's and none of those states offer a free tag to residents either. Although, AFAIK, MT does offer an OTC non-resident sheep tag.I would love to hunt sheep in WA, CA, MT, and any other state that has sheep,, for NOT one state other than Alaska gives any NR an over the counter tag.......
Yep. Once people figured out that they could charge more and more money for something and people would still pay, then it becomes about increasing revenue. They can manage for residents or for revenue. Residents sure as heck aren't going to pay $25k for their sheep if they don't have to, I don't think.All this is about the 15 to 20K a sheep is worth and Bears are even worse. Money brings out the worst in folks.
Guys that have youth that can hunt and a plane can hunt some of the absolute best guided areas in the state now and not have to deal with any pressure from guides. That's gonna be awesome......For the kids!