fwafwow
WKR
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2018
- Messages
- 5,552
I wish this was the case. Nothing compares to the government when it comes to problems, but scientists and journal editors are still people and they argue among themselves, even over how to interpret the same data from a single study. The vetting of "peer review" is not without bias. Scientific journals can have bias, research articles can be ghost-written and research that doesn't support a hypothesis isn't always even reported, much less published.You can't really argue with science because scientific research and findings go through such a thoroughly vetted system to even become published, it's nearly impossible for things like religion and politics to skew them. Thankfully it's a better system than our checks and balances within government. I'd even argue that it's a more pure form than philosophy and ethics because it doesn't pick sides.