That is not what thumb safeties are for, or not what they only are for.
The “thumb safety bad” nonsense in this thread is based on ignorance and lack of experience.
You gotta watch those Staccato’s when they get dirty…..
Just over 40,000 rounds, never cleaned even a single time, no malfunctions.
View attachment 865709
View attachment 865712
View attachment 865711
View attachment 865713
Right after those picture- somewhere around 43,000 rounds it experienced its first malfunction-
View attachment 865717
About 1,000+/- rounds later, a second malfunction-
View attachment 865718
If you look at the first picture, you can see the issue… There was so much carbon built up under the extractor, that it was being held out (open) and wasn’t grabbing the rim. Pulled extractor, scraped the backside with a knife removing close to 1/8” of baked on carbon. Put extractor back in, and it has functioned perfectly for now over 60,000 rounds.
I have been around several dozen used heavily for at least 10,000 plus rounds- only one needed a slight extractor tweak, and Staccato changed how they QC the guns don’t didn’t happen again.
Staccato 2011 P’s using Gen 3 mags, especially with Atlas Plus 18% mag springs have proven to be as reliable as any other serious service pistol. The C and CS are even more reliable (Glock level).
No it wasn’t. The modern isosceles and modified isosceles, as well as the thumbs forward grip came from Brian Enos and Rob Leatham- both shooting 1911’s.
Drop safe is not why a proper thumb safety is a good idea. This simply shows a lack of understanding on your part.
That is objectively and demonstrably untrue. On average new shooters to mid level shooters (say D class to mid A class USPSA) see the most difference in performance of a 1911/2011 over a Glock- between 15-25% depending on shooter.
Is this from personal experience with a real understanding of the guns?