More gun control from the public land "sportsmen's" group

Most Republicans being against public lands isn't an argument.

It's a fact.
Yeah, state your source for this "fact". You're entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts. Don't confuse bought off politicians with the rest of either party. Your blood pressure and critical thinking will be much better off.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
Not sure how this is a surprise.

Leftists love guns. They just don’t want you to have them. Guns are essential to leftists as their policies require force to gain compliance.

Kimber was trash for years. They mainstreamed MIM into small parts that failed constantly but spent big money on marketing and bribery of gunwriters.

Their business model was scamming the buyer into buying a project gun with sexy marketing…and targeting boomers with nostalgia of 1911s.

Clintons gun ban made it viable.

There are big parts of the gun world that are elitist and see themselves as above normal gun owners…go spend time around Class 3 owners for a full dose.

Now Kimbers management is at Sig…
 
Most Republicans being against public lands isn't an argument.

It's a fact.
Gotcha. I read your's as piling on the "well obviously he's evil and the enemy, he's a DEMOCRAT!" pile.

And yeah, it's definitely frustrating when people view everyone as falling into one of two monoliths.

And yeah, now that I think about it... All my friends that I know are Communist are also gun owners. Lol

You just told us all your friends are Dems. How exactly do you know how Repubs stand on public land issues? MSNBC?
 
Gotcha. I read your's as piling on the "well obviously he's evil and the enemy, he's a DEMOCRAT!" pile.

And yeah, it's definitely frustrating when people view everyone as falling into one of two monoliths.

And yeah, now that I think about it... All my friends that I know are Communist are also gun owners. Lol

How do you have communists as friends?

Perhaps you missed the last century or so, where communists literally murdered more human beings than any other group in the history of the world and did so gleefully…for their greater good.

Their sycophants still preach it…


WTF…
 
Not sure how this is a surprise.

Leftists love guns. They just don’t want you to have them. Guns are essential to leftists as their policies require force to gain compliance.

Kimber was trash for years. They mainstreamed MIM into small parts that failed constantly but spent big money on marketing and bribery of gunwriters.

Their business model was scamming the buyer into buying a project gun with sexy marketing…and targeting boomers with nostalgia of 1911s.

Clintons gun ban made it viable.

There are big parts of the gun world that are elitist and see themselves as above normal gun owners…go spend time around Class 3 owners for a full dose.

Now Kimbers management is at Sig…
I know quite a few high level Class 3 owners... they're way more down to earth than the weekend tacticool types. Far more invested and they have to be much more careful.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
I know quite a few high level Class 3 owners... they're way more down to earth than the weekend tacticool types. Far more invested and they have to be much more careful.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
That's been my experience as well. Except for that one guy from MT that got busted at the Jan 6th fiasco.
 
I know quite a few high level Class 3 owners... they're way more down to earth than the weekend tacticool types. Far more invested and they have to be much more careful.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Yup - my experience as well. A difference class of folks - pun intended...

In other news:

Finished Busse's book just now. Had he left out the NRA, Trump, and 'couch commando' condemnation, there wouldn't have been much of a book. For all the pomp of the book, the takeaway is the same old, same old: common sense gun laws, close the gun-show loophole, etc. No details of course on what that would actually look like or how it could be implemented with full support - mainly 'The NRA has polarized the country using guns and it's got to stop.'

One thing I found rather annoying is his constant referring to the 1911 (basically what made Kimber an ass-load of money), as a '100 year old design' as if Kimber making 1911s was an exercise in nostalgia. Clearly this was an attempt to minimize the fact it was a military weapon - gave it more of a Grandpa feel.

Interestingly he drew a firm line between a defensive weapon and an offensive one - the high-cap ARs are offensive and the golly-gee willikers 1911, with its 8rd capacity is of course defensive "designed to stop a 200lb man running at you' he stated at least twice. This meshes easily into where to draw the line on which guns YOU should be able to have (Who needs an OFFENSIVE weapon?)

I don't remember him addressing the 2A really at all, acted as though because Obama studied constitutional law at Harvard his opinion on the Constitution was sound, and again, you want pew-pews (yes he talked about this) largely due to fear, white supremacy, and machismo.

You all should read it.
 
Completely unnecessary to read such drivel. Long story shorter. Dude is wrong... AND... he's a freakin idiot for thinking there is some weird distinction between the kinds of arms an individual citizen should need and what his governance should be allowed to have... THAT... is his "major malfunction".
 
Yeah, state your source for this "fact". You're entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts. Don't confuse bought off politicians with the rest of either party. Your blood pressure and critical thinking will be much better off.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Anyone voting is sharing in the sins of those they vote for.
 
Rokslide: (With no evidence) BHA is a wolf in sheeps clothing! They're playing the longest long game ever to end hunting! Richard Berman said so!

Also Rokslide: NRA's proven corruption that has done more harm than good to law abiding gun owners and 2A advocates and the proven wasteful spending on Wayne's wardrobe that does nothing to help their mission or members is totally okay and totally defensible. You're a Fudd if you say anything different!
both of these things can be true simultaneously without contradiction
 
both of these things can be true simultaneously without contradiction
Absolutely they could be. What's a contradiction is the response/backlash based on the facts we know. For one we have irrefutable proof of corruption, mishandling and misuse of org resources and money and one we don't. With that, one would think it would be obvious which organization gets criticized and held over the coals...except it's just the opposite.
 
Good links posted above. Takes the wind out of the sails of those who support anti-gun and making it difficult for hunters. As someone said here, Wolf in Sheep's clothing.

A very common tactic that took place in the USFS just to name one entity that has been taken over by those who do not want hunters to hunt or want to close off large areas to off road vehicles, etc. In Cali, they simply close gates half the year under the guise of "It's winter and rains will rut the roads if people drive on them". It is bone dry here most of the winter. "There are Tiger Salamanders here, so close it down to all" Easy to plant a salamander and claim it's their habitat. Point being, the hard left has infiltrated most gov't run bureaucracies to the point they control those bureaucracies, all in the name of "Saving the forests"

Here where I am, Central Cal, the USFS does not or rarely even go into the forests any longer. They are all mostly keyboard warriors now. They just close the gates to many areas. That is their way of "managing" the forests. They hate off roaders and hunters, they love the rock climbers, hikers etc. I have no beef with the latter demographic , just saying how it is.

Where I had my remote recreational ranch, just 7 years ago, there were regular patrols, clean up at camp sights, grading roads, and relative easy access. Today they quit grading the roads to the point one can barely drive thru and if you have 2-wheel drive, forget it. That is how they "manage" the forests today. Many areas run by Mexican Cartels growing reefer. When that became legal in Cal, that was suppose to end the black market when in fact, it fueled it because there are enough people to buy their product to avoid the high taxes that come with buying legal pot. I did have grow sights within 1 mile of my camp that LE did raid because it was so obvious. Many areas they do not bother trying to eradicate the grow sites, too much trouble. If its blatant, they will, but they do not make much effort in doing so. So, now these forest lands have the risk of you stumbling upon a grow sight where growers are usually armed and commonly booby trap the area. You cannot even target shoot any longer in many areas of the Santa Lucia District which is within the Los Padres Nation Forest. Radical rabid anti-gun lovers have taken over most Gov't agencies here in Calif. Are there good eggs with that dept.? Yes, but they are marginalized and few.
 
I refer back to my earlier comments about BHA..."If the core mission is good then ignore the noise".
What we need is a Privatize and Sell Off Public Land group that is 100% pro-gun. Yea
I'm going to quit my church because the guy serving donuts after the service is a jerk.
 
Back
Top