Maven RS1.2 2.5-15x44mm SHR-Mil Q&A

rbutcher1234

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Jul 2, 2023
Messages
180
I preferred lows when I had my tikka. Now, I can’t use low height rings on my hunting gun, it would be impossible to view the scope
 

Dobermann

WKR
Joined
Sep 17, 2016
Messages
2,092
Location
EnZed
Aaaand ... they're out of stock again. Longer run than last time, but still a business model that doesn't make sense to me. (It's not like in the run-up to Christmas that we might have other expenses competing for our funds ...)
 

GoatPackr

WKR
Joined
Jan 5, 2023
Messages
484
Aaaand ... they're out of stock again. Longer run than last time, but still a business model that doesn't make sense to me. (It's not like in the run-up to Christmas that we might have other expenses competing for our funds ...)
They're expected back in a month or so.
 

GoatPackr

WKR
Joined
Jan 5, 2023
Messages
484
Good to know. I used to be the bunny that contacted Maven and posted ETAs here, but got a bit burned by a combination of incorrect dates and incredibly small restock amounts ...
I must have gotten one of the last with the last shipment. I received it Monday.
Might be awhile before I order but definitely plan on 3 more unless something shinier comes along.
 

satchamo

WKR
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Messages
857
Picked up a RS1.2 for my tikka and will be buying a pair of the UM rings and level when funds allow. From my readings, the medium UM rings seem to be the sweet spot for usability for most people. Any reason to buy the lows over the mediums? Anybody have the sight height available for that combo?

I tried lows per their chart and granted I had a Sendero profile carbon barrel at that time, it was tight. Then you add a suppressor and you get some pretty bad obstruction from the can at low mag. And then your mirage is that much worse. I swapped to medium and it solved the issue for me.

If you’re running a straight stock t3x with no suppressor I’d say the low is def the better option - especially if you run the factory stock.
 
Top