- Thread Starter
- #821
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2014
- Messages
- 10,119
If you were buying a general hunting scope is it safe to say the RS1.2 Mill would be it? ThanksThe RS1.2 is a better general hunting scope than anything NF offers. That Maven may, or may not make or care about any more scopes that are durable, doesn’t mean that the RS1.2 isn’t.
If you were buying a general hunting scope is it safe to say the RS1.2 Mill would be it? Thanks
sounds like rokscope prototype testing is going well? hehOf what is currently available, yes.
You mean the trijicon credo? It’s pretty darn close. I love mine. It’s what inspired me to get my Tenmile2-10x38 FFP at sub 16 ounces Would be a darn near perfect backpacking western scope.
You mean the trijicon credo? It’s pretty darn close. I love mine. It’s what inspired me to get my Tenmile
A half pound too heavy. That scope makes no sense. Same weight as the 3-18 Tenmile that I already own.You mean the trijicon credo? It’s pretty darn close. I love mine. It’s what inspired me to get my Tenmile
Try the silver bundle.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
@Formidilosus where do you place Trijicon scopes for torque spec? "good scopes with thick tubes" or with the latter bunch. Or does it depend on model?Ring screw torque= 34in-lbs on good scopes with thick tubes- NF, RS1.2, SWFA, S&B, etc. 28in-lbs if using a Leupold, Vortex, Swaro, etc.
@Formidilosus where do you place Trijicon scopes for torque spec? "good scopes with thick tubes" or with the latter bunch. Or does it depend on model?