Masculinity and Caliber Choice

jimh406

WKR
Joined
Feb 6, 2022
Messages
1,196
Location
Western MT
Just a different angle, granted the military is always right, but why are we spending effort to move away from the 5.56 when a 223 is all they need?
 

LCV

FNG
Joined
Mar 28, 2023
Messages
41
Location
SC
So everybody that doesn’t share your life experiences is a troll or catfish? That sounds like solid analytical skills. Lol
Calling people stupid for having an opinion, that has some evidence to support it, and then providing no counter argument other than vague non sequiturs about life in Wyoming is not trolling?
 

Robobiss

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Jan 3, 2024
Messages
210
Just a different angle, granted the military is always right, but why are we spending effort to move away from the 5.56 when a 223 is all they need?
From what I understand they are looking for a cartridge to better penetrate body armor, not necessarily to make it a better killer in regards to soft/unarmored targets.

That said, because of the Geneva convention the U.S. military is not allowed to use any ammunition that is designed to “expand or flatten easily inside of a human target”. Everything has to essentially be a FMJ or AP round. Pretty much ALL of the leaps and bounds in regards to projectile improvement we have made over the last 100 years is off limits to the military.

Now, 5.56 ball ammo DOES tumble and fragment at high velocities (not sure exactly how high) but gets much less effective with distance. When you are talking non-expanding projectiles, bigger generally IS better.
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2019
Messages
1,888
This is the way (of the forum)… when all of the big game hunting seasons are closed.

I’m finding out more each year the stuff I get particular about in the off season
, goes out the window when it’s hunting season.

I get all wrapped up about ballistics and precision in the offseason, only to shoot a deer not more than 150 yards during hunting season.
 

wyosam

WKR
Joined
Aug 5, 2019
Messages
1,290
I have been hunting southern whitetails for decades. It really depends on the area hunting. If I am in the mountains or thick swampy areas, a magnum is never needed. A 7mm08, 308, 338Fed or 358W work as well as many others like the 30-30. If hunting farm land, a 28 Nosler or 300PRC is needed for the reach with high BC bullets. My answer…It depends.

How far are those longer shots? That 7-08 will reach out further than I generally hear anyone talk about shooting whitetails.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

9.3koolaid

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Feb 2, 2017
Messages
195
Location
Alaska
because of the Geneva convention the U.S. military is not allowed to use any ammunition that is designed to “expand or flatten easily inside of a human target”. Everything has to essentially be a FMJ or AP round.
If I close my eyes and have someone read me this thread I'm transported to the Sportsmans gun counter
 

Robobiss

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Jan 3, 2024
Messages
210
If I close my eyes and have someone read me this thread I'm transported to the Sportsmans gun counter
Bahahahahaha.

That’s true though! At least that’s what we were taught in Inchon range in bootcamp.

Edit: there’s NO WAY my drill instructors lied to me /sarcasm
 

Formidilosus

Super Moderator
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
10,141
It’s going to be harder than I thought to convince a buddy to take a 223 rack hunting with me. I asked if they had a 223 with 77 gr TMK, or a 300 mag and 200 gr Accubond to choose from for these hard shots, which would they prefer, and nobody chose the 223 :-(

Dang it all to heck.

I’ll keep trying. *chuckle*

View attachment 701145View attachment 701144

Have you personally taken a 1st shot in the butt on an elk? Yes or no?


In any case, 77gr TMK’s have no issue penetrating and breaking the spine or a femur.


IMG_8198.jpeg



Exit side-
IMG_8199.jpeg
 

Thegman

WKR
Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Messages
723
I actually saw one of these lifted with something around a 30 inch tire. I was honestly impressed, there was absolutely NO brake over angle on that thing and talking to the guy that built it he said the wheel base allows him to pretty much walk through a lot of crap.
I was told by a guy in Switzerland that when "Smart" cars first came out, they would sometimes flip over backwards when starting too fast on a steep hill. They had to design some sort of limiter in order to address that issue.

Now we're standing at the O'Reilly counter...
 
Joined
Nov 14, 2020
Messages
1,184
Have you ever shot a quiche in the ass??

(Is "a quiche" correct?) ....I always call it "quee-chee" to annoy my daughters....
No… but I have eaten the entire butt end of a quiche. I generally find it unnecessary to shoot them, as they are slow and docile. Don’t shoot em, just sneak up behind them, grab and eat.
 
Joined
Feb 2, 2020
Messages
2,734
That’s no better, instead we just fight about fixed vs mechanical, single vs multi-pin, and heavy vs light arrows. All the same shit
True, but the threads seem to be less prevalent and less likely to drag on to 20+ pages of BS, at least from what I've seen. I pretty much ignore what is new and hot with archery anyway. I've shot fixed heads and plain Jane gold tip hunter xts my entire life and don't plan on changing because I know the ins/outs and it works for me. My biggest regret is selling my Mathews LX in favor of a vxr. It's nowhere near as accurate in my hands as that old LX
 

30338

WKR
Joined
Jun 2, 2013
Messages
1,985
As a young kid I started out with a 7mm Remington. Then a 7mmSTW. Then a 338 win mag. Then a 340 weatherby. Then a 375 Weatherby. Then a 30-06. Then a 6.5-06. Then a 6.5x47. Kind of settled on the 6.5x47, 6.5-284 and 6x45 for hunting stuff these days.

It was a fun road to go down, but if I had just started with a 6.5 creedmoor or a 30-06 I'd have lacked for nothing. Scopes that dial correctly have greatly enhanced my long range performance far more than more horsepower did.
 
Joined
Nov 14, 2020
Messages
1,184
My only comment about the masculinity of any caliber is this. If your masculinity depends on the gun you shoot and the vehicle you drive… you’re pretty insecure about it in the first place.

Real masculinity is loyalty and service …. being a loving and present father and husband, bringing home the bacon ( or tofu) , helping friends and family, sticking up for those who need your help, meeting your obligations, doing the hard work of being a decent human being.
 

mxgsfmdpx

WKR
Joined
Oct 22, 2019
Messages
5,988
Location
Outside
It's a stretch when the argument has to shift all the way to Texas heart shots and spine shots to try and justify your "side". Also grand assumptions about the results of the aforementioned shots because a projectile might be "larger" being the basis for your conclusion.

Just wow.
 

TaperPin

WKR
Joined
Jul 12, 2023
Messages
3,274
Thanks for answering the question.

I noticed you mention about teaching this particular shot (facing directly away). Do you have a source for targets? Maybe whitetail as well. Thanks.
I’ve never seen a pelvis target, but the most helpful practice seems to be spent visualizing what’s going on around the pelvis. The point we’re aiming for is as far forward as the visible bumps of the hips. We call it aiming for the base of the tail, but it’s a little farther forward than that. Height down from the hairline is the most important - that’s where “base of the tail” is about right. If the spine is going directly away from you, the target is little more than a tennis ball. If the animal is going uphill slightly, or you’re a little above, there is more spine to hit if the bullet goes a little high.

When an animal is on the ground a hands-on anatomy lesson is the best teacher.

Pretty soon you’ll pick out anatomy drawings that aren’t quite right - it seem somewhat common for illustrators to assume the spine is straight as an arrow or bowed like a hunchback. Lol
A576B0D7-B885-4561-9FA2-56F33E7B23F9.jpegAB8D05B9-ECD2-4CB4-A1B0-FC92C231241A.jpeg032D26BA-8B64-4446-B3FF-4A22341FA6B4.jpeg
 
Top