I’d be in the needs to be a net positive for the public category in order to transfer. I like some of the trades that have been made. Some people go nuts because it’s a net acreage loss but the quality available to the public goes up. I’m okay with that. I’m not okay with slow chipping away without clear benefit. I’m in the no single transaction that doesn’t have an environmental, wildlife, or hunting fishing access benefit. Remember, mining companies etc.. aren’t in their board meetings going “well, what about the hunters?” Advocate selfishly, the other side is.