Looking for a Wyoming resident hunting partner

[LFC911]

At least the @ZackBarnes is trying to go about it the right way. It’s just the others that won’t leave their keyboards pushing their agenda.

Some of us have to wait a few years to build our points back up.

 

[Swamp Fox]

I would ignore all these other clowns ^^^ trying to hijack your thread, and listen to *this* clown:

Have you thought about Match.com? Your wife might not like it --though you never know -- but you could meet a girl with huge ... tracts of land ... that will make you forget all about hunting wilderness.

I could expand on this idea, prolly out to about $60 worth if anyone paid writers anymore, but I've heard the moderators here have a hair trigger ...So I think I'll pass on pressing it.

 

[LFC911]

 

[ez_willie]

I just wanna corner cross from wilderness to wilderness to watch heads explode.

 

[ThorM465]

You also have to think that the wardens might change their approach when they find out breaking the law is being flaunted.

Heaven forbid we don't bow down and kiss the King's men's boots. Any true American would be ashamed to enforce such an unjust and corrupt regulation.

 

[ThorM465]

The real question is what should be the fine to actually deter people?

No the real question is what gives them the right to deny Americans access to public access federal lands based on state residency.

 

[ThorM465]

At least the @ZackBarnes is trying to go about it the right way. It’s just the others that won’t leave their keyboards pushing their agenda.

You would have been one of the tories wagging your finger at the great Americans who dumped the tea into the harbor.

 

[Wyo_hntr]

Heaven forbid we don't bow down and kiss the King's men's boots. Any true American would be ashamed to enforce such an unjust and corrupt regulation.

Just a free man traveling not engaged in commerce.

Why even bother with tags or permits?

 

[type2bowhunter]

Just a free man traveling not engaged in commerce.

Why even bother with tags or permits?

This is a bit fallacious. One can support the conservation model of tag allocation and yet not support a state usurping federal rights.

 

[Jason Snyder]

No the real question is what gives them the right to deny Americans access to public access federal lands based on state residency.

They aren’t denying you access to land. They are denying access to wildlife, held in trust by the state of Wyoming.

 

[Wyo_hntr]

This is a bit fallacious. One can support the conservation model of tag allocation and yet not support a state usurping federal rights.

They are not "usurping" anything.

 

[Jason Snyder]

You would have been one of the tories wagging your finger at the great Americans who dumped the tea into the harbor.

You’re a real peach. Insult others because they don’t agree with you?

 

[type2bowhunter]

They are not "usurping" anything.

Sorry I thought that wilderness areas were on usfs land?

 

[Wyo_hntr]

Sorry I thought that wilderness areas were on usfs land?

And?

 

[Archer86]

Go figure the same cry babies going from thread to thread encouraging hunters to break fish and game laws they dont agree with.

you all should go to Alaska and shoot some goats and brown bear while you are at it and see how that goes.

 

[Archer86]

Some of us have to wait a few years to build our points back up.

Luckly it's going to continue to take more and more points

 

[Jason Snyder]

Real nice hi jack of the original thread.

 

[type2bowhunter]

And?

Honestly I don't really have a dog in the fight and have no plans of hunting WY any time soon. That said, based solely on principle I do take issue with WY preventing people from hunting federal land because of where they reside. It seems like overreach to me. That or a way to fill the pockets of the guides. Now if I chose to hunt WY I would probably do what the OP is trying to do and find a resident to hunt with because despite what you may think I do respect local fish and game rules. So good on the OP for toeing the line, respect. But shame on WY for the arbitrary regulations. And as a CA resident I know arbitrary regulations when I see them.

 

[Wyo_hntr]

That's cool and all, but Wyoming has the right to manage its wildlife. They have private land only tags, off national forest tags.

They are not preventing anyone from hunting federal land. They are simply regulating how a non-resident can hunt federally designated wilderness.

Fix the mess in your own backyard.

 

[type2bowhunter]

They are not preventing anyone from hunting federal land. They are simply regulating how a non-resident can hunt federally designated wilderness.

This is redundant. Preventing and regulating are synonyms here.