Thanks for your opinion tips. Sometimes a person's perspective is to narrow and they miss the bigger broader picture (happens to me way to much)
this 1.9 million arces will sure add the chunk of land under federal protection in southeastern utah. Three national parks two current monuments.
I'm personally torn not because I don't think it needs protection but the best way to go about it. The 8 person board without anyone representing utahans is a no go for me. These places also have special meaning to some not belonging to any of the five tribes. The national parks service,blm,and forest service currently are pushing to restrict access across the board. Nothing worse than changing policy and not having a voice at the table.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
I'm personally torn not because I don't think it needs protection but the best way to go about it. The 8 person board without anyone representing utahans is a no go for me. These places also have special meaning to some not belonging to any of the five tribes. The national parks service,blm,and forest service currently are pushing to restrict access across the board. Nothing worse than changing policy and not having a voice at the table.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk