it's the same as far as the fit goes, but I think the rand and midsole are a bit different.
What all has been changed from the original Cevedale Aron?
What all has been changed from the original Cevedale Aron?
This isn't my actual review, but here's some info on the boots.
L&S wanted a flag ship boot that would not only work in sheep/mountain goat hunting environments, but also work just as well for hunting elk, antelope or turkeys in the low land.
The problem with most mountaineering boots is they're usually stiff as hell and don't allow for much articulation in the ankle area (feels like a ski boot). Having the stiffness is great some of the time, but a lot of people will have issues with heel lift/rub with a stiff boot and loose a bit of agility too.
So we knew that we wanted a boot that had a very stiff sole, but great articulation/flexibility in the ankle area. This would give you the best of both worlds (great for climbing in steep country, but also great for normal hunting)..... and the search began.
I ended up testing 14 different boots in the last 2 years for L&S and the Cevedale stood above the rest. I liked the fact it was semi crampon compatible, very stiff in the sole, but felt like a standard backpacking boot in the ankle. All of these things allowed me to climb like a madman on steep ascents (like a mountaineering boot), but also have the mobility/agility you find in a hiking boot (like a Salomon Quest).
For me, I need a toe box that is somewhat wide, but more of a medium arch width and a narrow heel cup. Most boots that are wide enough in the toe box for me will be WAY to wide in the heel and somewhat wide in the arch. The width in the heel is the big issue, as I get giant blisters on the outsides of them.
The CTH (Cevedale Tech Hunter) is also EXTREMELY light weight, and is comparable to the weight of most trail hiking boots. This makes a huge difference in fatigue throughout the day, as you'll be lifting less weight per step.
Ask away with questions, as I won't have the article up for at least another week.
outside looking in.... looks too short for heavy load stability? curious as well.
As you can see by my list, I haven't worn many boots taller than the CTH.
I'm not a believer in the tall boot/more ankle support theory.
I have a question for Aron or anyone else that has these. How stiff are the soles? I am looking for the stiffest possible as I have damaged big toe joints. I need boots that keep the big toe from getting flexed backwards. So the sole/shank must be very stiff and the sole must have some natural roll built into it so the boot transitions through each step without being ski boot like. Hopefully that makes sense.....
I am using cabelas Alaska hikers with decent success but am always looking for something better so I am wondering how these or other options stack up. By the way, I tried kennetreks and couldn't cure the heel slip.
For those that have used both how do these compare to the Tibets? I've gotten four years out of my current Tibets and am planning to order again soon, but these look like they may be worth a shot. I do not want to go stiffer than my Tibet's.
ressurecting a dead thread..but did they run true to size??