Mosski
FNG
Looking to pick one of these up and would love some input. Will mostly see it's use in backpacking mule deer and elk hunts. I had a Kowa 77 and switched it for a Swaro STS 65 but am wanting something with a little more horsepower.
Copy, those pictures look great!I own a Kowa 88, my brother owns a Meopta. I haven't looked through his scope but the other day at the range mine was set up and he was spotting my hits. Afterwards he commented how much better the image was through my Kowa and how disappointed he was in his Meopta. Not much of a test or comparison but it's one data point I guess.
Again, I haven't looked through a Meopta but have heard good things about them in general until my brother expressed his disappointment. I can say that the Kowa is a very impressive scope. I love that thing. It's heavy but I still packed it on my mule deer hunt this year and plan to do it again next year.
Here's a couple images through the Kowa from this season. I know there are a lot of variables that go into image quality through a spotter so take it with a grain of salt but I do enjoy the scope.
Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk
Dose your brother have the meostar or the meopro?Copy, those pictures look great!
What do you mean by correction?I would consider whether 60x is enough or if you need 70x plus. I regularly use 75x and would not want to be limited to 60x. If so, I would likely use a 60-65mm scope.
A big scope, to me, should handle higher magnifications. That would mean the 20-70x EP with the S2 or the 1.6x extender on the 88.
The S2 seems to have a really good reputation for correction. Not sure about the 88. The 880 seemed hit or miss with some real duds escaping.
I'm not an optical engineer or optician, but the simplest way for me to think about it is the fact that the instrument needs to manipulate light. Could be a binocular, spotting scope, rifle scope, etc. A well corrected scope has fewer aberrations compared to a poorly corrected scope. It has to due with how well the design and QC are executed to minimize aberrations.What do you mean by correction?
I'm honestly not sure, I'll have to ask him.Dose your brother have the meostar or the meopro?
I asked about the S2 82, which should indicate the meostar. The meopro is just the 80 HDOne can't just say Meopta scope without clarifying the Meopro or Meostar. They are 2 completely different animals.
"Should" i agree, but the guy saying his brother said kowa was much better said himself he didn't know which meopta. Some people think the brand is all that matters and literally don't realize different models have major differences.I asked about the S2 82, which should indicate the meostar. The meopro is just the 80 HD
Thanks for this!I actually owned the Kowa 884 and the Meopta S2 at the same time, and had them side by side many times in the field hunting. It's really splitting hairs IME to determine which one is better. I did wind up preferring the S2 simply because it was a touch sharper and brighter at the highest magnifications. Can't go wrong with either IMO, and I'd pick the one you get the best deal on.
Which eye piece did you rock on the meoptaI actually owned the Kowa 884 and the Meopta S2 at the same time, and had them side by side many times in the field hunting. It's really splitting hairs IME to determine which one is better. I did wind up preferring the S2 simply because it was a touch sharper and brighter at the highest magnifications. Can't go wrong with either IMO, and I'd pick the one you get the best deal on.