Is this going to be okay?

Rome

FNG
Joined
Oct 6, 2024
Messages
10
I’m doing a spring bear hunt in Idaho in 2025. This’ll be my first western hunt. I usually chase whitetail on the east coast. I’m currently planning to run my sig cross in 308 shooting a 168 grn Barnes TTSX round.

Is this going to be acceptable? The barrel on the cross is shorter than typical (16 inches), so that will drop some of the velocity of the round. Anticipated range would be 400yds and in with 150-300 being more likely.
 
OP
R

Rome

FNG
Joined
Oct 6, 2024
Messages
10
I'd rather be using 150 gr in a short barreled 308 in your scenario
I’m assuming this is to achieve higher velocity, yeah?

I thought about that route, as well as just getting a longer barrel.

My intention is to build a more suitable western hunting rifle in the future. I just happened to have this 308 so I was hoping to make it work.
 

KenLee

WKR
Joined
Jun 9, 2021
Messages
2,611
Location
South Carolina
I’m assuming this is to achieve higher velocity, yeah?

I thought about that route, as well as just getting a longer barrel.

My intention is to build a more suitable western hunting rifle in the future. I just happened to have this 308 so I was hoping to make it work.
Higher velocity to achieve expansion
 

180ls1

WKR
Joined
Apr 19, 2020
Messages
1,221
Nothing wrong with the rifle at all.

I'd try the Hornady Superformance 168 eld Match. It should give you the best velocity/expansion for the longest distance.
 
OP
R

Rome

FNG
Joined
Oct 6, 2024
Messages
10
Nothing wrong with the rifle at all.

I'd try the Hornady Superformance 168 eld Match. It should give you the best velocity/expansion for the longest distance.
Can you elaborate on this? Why would this be better suited than a cartridge with a ttsx projectile?
 

MHWASH

WKR
Joined
Aug 21, 2016
Messages
855
Location
S.E.WA
IMHO, the Barnes is a bad choice simply because in my experience they rarely drop animals on the spot. Bears have a tendency to run into the thick stuff when they're hit, and it usually takes 75-100 yards before they start leaving a blood trail. We've shot several bears with soft quick expanding bullets and they've done an excellent job. If you were going to go hunting with me, I would firmly insist you shoot a different bullet.
 
OP
R

Rome

FNG
Joined
Oct 6, 2024
Messages
10
IMHO, the Barnes is a bad choice simply because in my experience they rarely drop animals on the spot. Bears have a tendency to run into the thick stuff when they're hit, and it usually takes 75-100 yards before they start leaving a blood trail. We've shot several bears with soft quick expanding bullets and they've done an excellent job. If you were going to go hunting with me, I would firmly insist you shoot a different bullet.
What would you recommend specifically?
 

180ls1

WKR
Joined
Apr 19, 2020
Messages
1,221
Can you elaborate on this? Why would this be better suited than a cartridge with a ttsx projectile?

It will start out faster, maintain speed better (less wind drift too) and expand at lower velocities. All the above probably adds 300 yards to the distance it will kill at, that's just a guess. Run the numbers.
 

will_brap

FNG
Joined
Oct 2, 2024
Messages
21
I have called a number of black bears in for friends and shot a couple myself. I’m comfortable using anything that kills deer well for bear. This is in the dry inland west. I think the 308 is fine.

I think you’re less likely to get a good blood trail with all the hair on a bear and they’re hard to find in the brush. I’d focus on a round that kills well, not on super deep penetration or exits. Id shoot aomething like the heavier ELD M or ELD X or SST.

I was not impressed with the few animals I’ve shot (or seen shot) with monos.
 

will_brap

FNG
Joined
Oct 2, 2024
Messages
21
I’m doing a spring bear hunt in Idaho in 2025. This’ll be my first western hunt. I usually chase whitetail on the east coast. I’m currently planning to run my sig cross in 308 shooting a 168 grn Barnes TTSX round.

Is this going to be acceptable? The barrel on the cross is shorter than typical (16 inches), so that will drop some of the velocity of the round. Anticipated range would be 400yds and in with 150-300 being more likely.
For context my son shot a cow elk at 255 yards with a 16” 308 AR10 shooting 165 SSTs at 2514 FPS at the muzzle. Bullet hit a rib, shredded the lungs, hit the offside rib and the base exited. I’d be VERY happy with that bullet performance in a bear.

The only bear I took with that AR10 and a SST was a shot in the head that would have been fine with any soft point.
 

Pescetism

FNG
Joined
Dec 3, 2024
Messages
9
Location
MO
I believe Barnes states min impact velocity of 1,800 fps with most TTSX but general consensus seems to be that 2,000 fps would be a better limit. Plenty of ELDM/TMK examples expanding well at 1,800 fps and possibly a bit lower than that. It would be better for you to input your own numbers but these charts give you a ballpark comparison between the two bullets. https://jbmballistics.com/cgi-bin/jbmtraj-5.1.cgi1000017670.png1000017672.png
 

MT-nuffgun

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Jan 24, 2023
Messages
155
If I was in your shoes with that rifle and barrel length, I would shoot a 168 eldm or a 165 sst. Whichever one shot the best. The .308 with a 16” barrel does not lend itself very well to mono bullets at the ranges you describe due to lack of velocity. I’m not a fan of mono bullets myself, but most guys who have success with them are shooting high velocity and moderate ranges.
 
Top