Is it all Leopolds

When 98% of the market doesn't really track if their scope holds, or is bothered by re-zeroing when they get somewhere to hunt, how much market will they really pick up?



I'm not saying 98% of the scopes fail, I'm saying that probably 98% of the market is clueless on the topic. Everything that is pushed is about glass quality, or high zoom capabilities.
I get it but at some point, eventually, it will come back to bite them.
 
Or maybe it's irrelevant to 98% of the market because these "non holding" scopes consistently kill stuff? Just a guess.

98% of people have multiple scope and guns that never get used. They also dont really understand how scopes work. They also assume the scopes work as advertised. They have also been taught that rezeroing before a hunt is normal.
 
98% of people have multiple scope and guns that never get used. They also dont really understand how scopes work. They also assume the scopes work as advertised. They have also been taught that rezeroing before a hunt is normal.
I'd be willing to bet they're smart enough to know if they've killed something they've shot at.
 
98% of people have multiple scope and guns that never get used. They also dont really understand how scopes work. They also assume the scopes work as advertised. They have also been taught that rezeroing before a hunt is normal.

You should see the looks i get in louisiana toting around a .338 with a swfa 3-15 on top. It's basically an abomination on a gun rack full of leupolds. I haven't had to adjust it since I set it the first time despite riding on the floor of a boat, in the bed of the truck, kid knocking it over on the ground. Didn't have to tap on the turrets. Didn't have to go past what I wanted to dial and go back to it. Didn't have to make a small adjustment to see how much it'd really move.

Life's good since I put that swfa on my main rifle, and I have a hard time taking anything else out now because I trust that rig so much.
 
Or maybe it's irrelevant to 98% of the market because these "non holding" scopes consistently kill stuff? Just a guess.

Cars kill stuff all the time too.


Don't think that killing stuff is exactly the metric that should be used for determining if they hold zero.


Gut shots kill, ass shots kill, hail Mary hold overs kill, don't mean it's what we should strive for.
 
No issues here, have had one since late 90’s - currently on a Thompson Center and no issues holding or durability.
 
I need to go out to my gun safe and smack my Mark 5 with a big hammer for never losing zero yet lol 😂 but it does sit on my 300 ultra mag…..
 
No issues here, have had one since late 90’s - currently on a Thompson Center and no issues holding or durability.
How would you feel if you bought a newly assembled lemon Leupold scope that wasn't constructed with the same durability as your 30 year old Leupold?
 
The 2.5-8 bombing the drop test broke my heart. Mine have been flawless but they are on deer rifles that admittedly get treated very well and aren't bounced around much. It's the perfect general purpose eastern deer scope IMO.
 
I wanted to love Leupold so much I let 3 of them fail on me. After the second one it’s my fault.
VX3 erector tube failed
VX6 (first gen) CDS turret broke
MK5HD, the infamous loss of zero (twice, so my fault)
 
Back
Top