Knowing it wouldn’t hold zeroHe came to the conclusion he didn't like Leupold, sold it to someone who did.
Alright Theo. Calm down.After catching up on 5 pages, I quit reading.
The best and most reliable equipment especially if your man enough is a knife.
No chance of scope failure, no chance of a bad shot. It's the best for the hubting industry!
I never said that. I did have reservations after repeat offenses so I moved on.Knowing it wouldn’t hold zero
Knowing it wouldn’t hold zero
Again: ExactlyNope, it came back from Leupold with clean bill of health.
They said it met their standards.
You can decide if that means if it holds zero.
In fairness PRS embraces the fact that it's just an expensive game. The one to do away with the zero range would probably be better suited to NRL Hunter.I think prs would be a lot more interesting if they did away with the zero confirmation at the shoot.
Run what yah brung, hit that plate. No practice/warm up, or checks. Just hit something, imagine that.
Knowing it wouldn’t hold zero
In fairness PRS embraces the fact that it's just an expensive game. The one to do away with the zero range would probably be better suited to NRL Hunter.
Need more info.The mere mention of the word "Leupold" always provides entertaining/repetitive discussions. In reality this stuff really isn't that hard........
View attachment 795616
Dude, according to you and others leupolds hold zero and it’s a shitting shooting, different ammo, loose rings etc that dumb internet people don’t understand.Your logic does make sense if you are telling people the scope won’t hold zero when you sell it. Maybe you did that, but I can’t imagine anyone would pay much for a scope that you advertise as not holding zero.
If the scope is sold with full disclosure lie this:Amusing progression.
If true, then the inverse must also be true, the person who bought the scope has no integrity because they took advantage of someone falsely believing the products are flawed..... Now it is starting to sound like buying and selling are not compatible with integrity.
Hell, perhaps giving them away is also an integrity violation and destructive disposal is the only acceptable course. Though, now we might be abligated to pass laws against them too.
Are we at the bottom yet?
You notified. You are good to go.I took the time to send each and every failed Leupold back to them to repair/check for failure. I sold them when they came back with full disclosure that they went to Leupold for issues/suspected issues. No one batted an eye purchasing one. Is my integrity gone or is it still okay?
That would be good to go. You provided the documentation. Did you explain that they fail? And will fail and can’t be trusted? Did you take Pennies on the dollar?Had mine repaired under warranty and sold with the paperwork.
You will miss though.My first gun is a M70 featherweight that has a vari-x II on it. My Dads M70 supergrade has a Vari-X III. Both sit in the safe and the Seekins or Tikka with Trijicons go out in the field, but I kinda want to take the M70s out and shoot them now .
I’ve sold items for deals and even given things away on this forum, and have donated to the classifieds.That would be good to go. You provided the documentation. Did you explain that they fail? And will fail and can’t be trusted? Did you take Pennies on the dollar?
I always try to sell
Something and I’ll take a massive loss if I need to.
I believe ya. All your responses here gave supported you being a solid dude. Even when you didn’t take same stance.I’ve sold items for deals and even given things away on this forum, and have donated to the classifieds.
I don’t recall what I sold them for, but it would have been for an excellent used deal for someone.