Wasn’t the most fur friendly for me at 3450fps62gr eld-vt from 22 creed is perfect coyote bullet imo.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wasn’t the most fur friendly for me at 3450fps62gr eld-vt from 22 creed is perfect coyote bullet imo.
Naa no interest in an AR22arc in a 15 platform?
What do you recommend?Wasn’t the most fur friendly for me at 3450fps
If out of a fast 22 cal 52 grain hornady hp or if your gun doesn’t like boattail bullets the 53 grain hornady hp. Lost count of how many coyotes I’ve killed with these bullets with 220 swift, 220 swift ackley, 22-250, 22-250 ackley, 22 creed over the years.What do you recommend?
What do you recommend?
My integrally suppressed .22 Creed barrel from SWS Rifles has 14 inches of rifling with the final 6 inches as baffles. With 80-gr. factory ammo, its right at 3,000 fps.Sounds like I need a 22creed with light bullets… what is the shortest Barrel I could get away with without reducing the 22 creed potential down to the ballistics of a lesser cartridge?
For thermal hunting I don’t mind a longer barrel -24” to maximize velocity. Hornady reloading data says max on a 1:8 24” barrel 3850fps. Below are some rough figures based on that.Sounds like I need a 22creed with light bullets… what is the shortest Barrel I could get away with without reducing the 22 creed potential down to the ballistics of a lesser cartridge?
22-250 checks all the boxes. Factory ammo readily available now. Fast, knocks them down, and easy on pelts. 22 creed with light bullets will do the same but then you’re looking into reloading or paying a lot of $$$. I have a 22/250 for my thermal rig and it will be a creed when it gets a new barrel, BUT I reload. Will be shooting same projectile and roughly same speed just shorter barrel… that’s the plan anywayEvery time I come on this forum I end up adding more cartridges to my list rather than narrowing it down![]()
Reading through this forum again. Genuinely curious how much experience you have with any or all of these? I’ve used all 3. 40 vmax in 204 around 3700 fps. Small sample size but I blew large holes with a neck shot and two shoulders (both DRT) and had 2 runners (1 frontal and 1 poor gut shot). This was a sample size of 10ish and went away from 204. 22 creed (75 ELDM at 3350fps) I have had no runners and one bad pelt that was also hit far back. I was very surprised as most shots I can’t even tell where the bullet entered. 22-250 with the 50 grain Blitzkings at 3650 FPS have been amazing. Sample size larger at ~70. I’ve had 1 runner get away and 1 “splash.” I wish I could’ve got my hands on 39 Blitzkings for 204… would probably have me thinking differently about 204. In my experience Blitzkings vs vmax vs ELDM could be a bigger argument than cartridgeMany posters are neglecting these points. The .22-250 and .22 Creed ain’t gonna be fur-friendly. I stick with the .204 Ruger suggestion with the right bullet.
22-250, 204, and 243 are going to have your best factory options for saving fur (vmax, Blitzkings, a Armageddon, etc.) I don’t have personal experience with 243. 204 is fun but wont be any better than your 223. What you gain in velocity you will lose in BC/wind drift.Here’s an update on where I’m at with this…
—Leaning towards a 4 groove Kreiger barrel with 700 varmint contour
—20” barrel length
—need input on a Blueprinted rem700 vs Solus actions ($150 difference)
—MDT XRS chassis VS something like a Bell and Carlson as seen in the link below. I like the look of a stock better, but I understand benefits of chassis
Narrowed cartridges down to
-17Fireball
-204
-22arc
-6arc
-6creed
-22-250
-243
I’m having a dedicated night coyote gun built. 300 yard max distance. Tripod shooting only. I keep pelts so I don’t want to blow big holes in the coyotes
Bell and Carlson: Bell and Carlson Remington 700 SA BDL, Target/Competition, Adjustable Cheekpiece
Bell and Carlson is a leader in synthetic stock design, technology and manufacturer of the highest quality fiberglass, aramid and graphite gun stocks available.www.bellandcarlson.com
I prefer a chassis for thermal hunting due to the adjustability (shorter LOP) and easier to add stuff (rails/battery holders).Here’s an update on where I’m at with this…
—Leaning towards a 4 groove Kreiger barrel with 700 varmint contour
—20” barrel length
—need input on a Blueprinted rem700 vs Solus actions ($150 difference)
—MDT XRS chassis VS something like a Bell and Carlson as seen in the link below. I like the look of a stock better, but I understand benefits of chassis
Narrowed cartridges down to
-17Fireball
-204
-22arc
-6arc
-6creed
-22-250
-243
I’m having a dedicated night coyote gun built. 300 yard max distance. Tripod shooting only. I keep pelts so I don’t want to blow big holes in the coyotes
Bell and Carlson: Bell and Carlson Remington 700 SA BDL, Target/Competition, Adjustable Cheekpiece
Bell and Carlson is a leader in synthetic stock design, technology and manufacturer of the highest quality fiberglass, aramid and graphite gun stocks available.www.bellandcarlson.com
Great feedback, thank youI prefer a chassis for thermal hunting due to the adjustability (shorter LOP)
Get the machined action over the blue print 700. Will hold its value better for one and it has some better features (side bolt release, coating, rail/lug, etc).
Out of the calibers you narrowed it down to - I would skip the .17, .204, and arcs based on performance of available factory ammo or how available that ammo is. 22-250-243-6 creed all easy to find and affordable.