I think it depends on the state. MT I feel confident in my comparison. ID, WY, CO and others may be different.I'm not sure I'd agree. I personally know a handful of people who have killed an honest 200" buck, but I know exactly zero people who have killed a 400" bull.
Let's go.I'd compare a 200" mule deer to a 400" bull, personally. They are absolutely incredibly rare and ridiculous to see in person.
I hear ya! LolHaha you mean how the eastmans are shooting all those giant bucks on private ranches or land locked public like they have been for the last several years? Would love to know when the last true 200” was taken by an Eastman on public, draw, diy hunt.
Was having thing debate with a friend a little bit ago I said that at first but then we kind of settled that a 200=370 bull 220+=400. I personally know 3 guys that have killed 200 inch bucks and 0 that have killed 400 inch bulls. My father in laws guide buddies usually pull a 400 incher off of a giant private ranch in AZ every few years but even then lots of them in the high 300’s that don’t hit 400 markI'd compare a 200" mule deer to a 400" bull, personally. They are absolutely incredibly rare and ridiculous to see in person.
I'm not sure I'd agree. I personally know a handful of people who have killed an honest 200" buck, but I know exactly zero people who have killed a 400" bull.
Man that buck had it all! I think you are correct on your guesstimate. Absolutely awesome animal!Not sure if the one I saw this year was 200” but I think he might have been close. At least in gross score. I estimated 185ish frame with at least 15” of extras maybe 20”; he’s got a 12-14” mainline on the left and good deep forks with long downturned main beams.
Never could get a stalk on him.
View attachment 640255
View attachment 640256
The mass on him is unreal! What a buck!