How do we get a heavy (120+ grain) 6mm bullet made?

I messaged burger they have a product suggestion option on there contact pages.
My 6 cm is currently running at 108 Berger at 3100 and I would estimate that if Berger made a 120 ish a 22-24” cm creed would still push about 2900-2950 which is a great speed imo.


If they could get a g7 over .3 with a from factor about .9 it would be my go to for sure.

It would fit well in there existing eol line


I think making a bullet that can run in the creeds and fast twist .243 would have al out of market potential.
Just playing devil's advocate here ( I would love a 120+ bullet). If I am working at Berger, reading your email, my first question is: Why aren't you using our 115 Grain instead of the 108? Why build a 120, when you aren't using our heaviest available 6mm now?
 
Just playing devil's advocate here ( I would love a 120+ bullet). If I am working at Berger, reading your email, my first question is: Why aren't you using our 115 Grain instead of the 108? Why build a 120, when you aren't using our heaviest available 6mm now?
that’s exactly right, there 115 has a .956 form
Factor ( sectional density / g7) the 108 has .912.

.956 is not great

I’m probably over so simplifiting this but form factors is a measure of how good the bc is for the given weight. Berger has bullets below .9 see attached. So a .9 form factors 120 ish would be sweet.

@Formidilosus you run the WEZ a lot it’s my guess that bullets with better from factors almost always have higher hits, is that true ?

1710784061845.jpeg
 
Because the BC sucks for a 115gr bullet.
I totally understand that. I have been using the 105 VLDH because of that.

My position was from the Berger marketing department. I don't know that they would know why someone would ask for a 120, when they are not using the 115. And if they don't know, how good would their 120 be B.C. wise?
I think a tipped 120 would be the way to get the best possible "heavy" 6mm anyway.
I have a bunch of Dtacs, and 109 Eldm's to get me by until it happens. ;)
 
I think going away from the vld shape to hybrid shape would help with a higher bc but i can agree from a marking standpoint they need something to make it distinctive from the 115 vld. I however don’t think the 115 vld would is hugely popular
 
I think going away from the vld shape to hybrid shape would help with a higher bc but i can agree from a marking standpoint they need something to make it distinctive from the 115 vld. I however don’t think the 115 vld would is hugely popular
Maybe a good application for a new “EOL” bullet? A Berger 6mm 120 gr EOL has a nice ring to it…
 
I think going away from the vld shape to hybrid shape would help with a higher bc but i can agree from a marking standpoint they need something to make it distinctive from the 115 vld. I however don’t think the 115 vld would is hugely popular
I think they just need to do away with the 115 and replace it with something that has a better bc. The only reason I have considered them is to get berger consistency in a 115 to run in my 28" Ackley and stay under prs speed limit with enough pressure to get things to work right with h1000. I decided that the dtacs are good enough. When the wind gets high enough that I bring it out, everyone is dropping a ton of points. Having a 1/2 moa 10 shot group isn't gaining points over a 3/4 moa ten shot group in those matches. In normal winds I just run a 6 Dasher with 108 Bergers at idle speed and it does fine.
 
Berger needs to just do away with a lot of skus and focus on what guys are actually shooting. They have a boat load of bullets that just sit on the shelves it seems.
 
Well, if you are looking at something in the 243/6cm/25cm class, the 6CM with 103gr ELD-X, 108gr ELD-M, etc are great. Yes a 115-120gr TMK type bullet would be awesome, but that really comes into play when you are getting into something like a 6PRC or 6UM.
Would you consider the Barnes 112 match burners a viable option for a Tikka 243, 1:8? The barrel is currently at 22", but I'd prefer to cut it back to 18-19" (no suppressor).

This is specifically for bighorn ram hunting.

I've been using a 5.75 lb Kimber Hunter in 6.5 cm the past 3-4 years, but sold that rifle and will be using a 243 Tikka in a Rokstok moving forward.

Thanks
 
Would you consider the Barnes 112 match burners a viable option for a Tikka 243, 1:8? The barrel is currently at 22", but I'd prefer to cut it back to 18-19" (no suppressor).

This is specifically for bighorn ram hunting.

I've been using a 5.75 lb Kimber Hunter in 6.5 cm the past 3-4 years, but sold that rifle and will be using a 243 Tikka in a Rokstok moving forward.

Thanks

Absolutely. The 112gr MB upsets violently, and is probably near perfect for sheep, goats, deer, etc.
 
Absolutely. The 112gr MB upsets violently, and is probably near perfect for sheep, goats, deer, etc.
Interesting. I hadn’t considered the 112MB before. I have about 195 TMKs left, but would you lean towards the 108 ELDM or the 112 MB as a replacement once out. I like the higher BC in the MB.
 
Interesting. I hadn’t considered the 112MB before. I have about 195 TMKs left, but would you lean towards the 108 ELDM or the 112 MB as a replacement once out. I like the higher BC in the MB.

I’ll trade you 112 MB for some 95gr TMK’s….
 
Sounds like an opportunity for Hornady to continue the pattern and create a new bullet around a 6PRC line.

One of the Hornady guys over on the Hide stated they wouldn’t do a 25 PRC due to it being overbore so that pretty much leaves the 6 PRC as a wildcat.
 
Back
Top