How bad is the hunting in Montana?

Jon Boy

WKR
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
1,930
Location
Paradise Valley, MT
With constant pitching of season changes, new legislature etc it makes me start wondering just how bad is the hunting in my home state?

In my mid 20s I participated in a number of great SE deer hunts which generally resulted in a 4-6 year old buck being harvested in 24 hours or less. I understand that now that just isn't the case and the lack of mature deer and heavy hunting pressure can be very alarming.

However, outside of mature mule deer buck hunting in R6&7, just how bad is the rest of the hunting in Montana? From my recent observations, it appears there are a plethora of mature whitetails in both the mtns as well as the prairies. We currently hold what I think is the best controlled elk hunting in the world (or close to it) and I can't even keep track of the number of 360-400 in bulls I see getting harvested on public land in a certain part of the state. I also can hardly keep track of the number of very large mule deer bucks I see being harvested in another corner of the state.

I hear the same complaints surrounded around private land elk factories. All of the elk are on private, cant find anything on public, the weather is too nice, and whatever excuse a hunter can have for their lack of success. Between my main hunting partner and I we saw 51 legal bulls on public land during the general rifle season across 4 different mtn ranges. Two of those mtn ranges I would consider heavily influenced by private lands but year after year it seems more and more elk are spilling onto public lands. I also see year after year the amount of hunter effort going down. By the 5th day of season at a major (and popular) trailhead, there was one vehicle parked other than ours. That held true for the remainder of the season and also held true across various different units and ranges. The most bizarre experience I had was the very last day of season, while scouting for next season, was the number of rigs frantically buzzing up and down the road looking to fill their tag. 600 or 700 yards off the road, there were a group of elk with legal bulls feeding away without a care in the world. I didn't even hide the fact I was glassing, halfway hoping one of the road hunters would notice what I was looking at and maybe fill their tags. I can go and on about archery elk hunting general units in montana, but if you cant find elk on public you just arent trying that hard. I do have to admit, this was one of our better seasons, but between the two of us, at the very least one of us shoots a mature 6 point every year and we are able to pass many small bulls along the way.

I see the same blanket statements made for all of Montana's mtn mule deer- no mature deer, too much harvest etc. Between the tracks and actual deer I see while late season elk hunting, coupled with trail cam photos from over the years, I can't help but disagree. The majority of the mtn deer in this state are extremely hard to hunt. For whatever reason these deer just don't use the big, beautiful basins in the high country for summer and fall range and are generally one elevation band below that in the timber, making them extremely hard to hunt even during the rut. Another thing is, the mtn deer in the mountainous areas of the SW, SC and central part of the state generally aren't very big. I'd say the top end for many of them is a heavy compact rack that might hit `140". Attached photo is an example of that and is from a camera that had 18 different bucks on it, with 10 of those deer being 3-5+. This is a range that is blamed for piss poor mule deer hunting. In my opinion, its just a very tough and rugged unit that is heavily timbered and the majority of the deer population isnt even hunted. That doesn't make them immature and its relatively unfair to think you can legislate your way to big deer when in fact we have old deer. We will never have 3 year old 180" deer that parts of wyo and colorado pump out every year.

With all of this said, am I alone in what I'm observing? Is hunting that bad in Montana, or do we live in the era of instant gratification and everyone just assumes with average effort they deserve a big buck and bull every few years? Are all of the overcrowding issues stemmed around a few popular units and sections of state and block management? Or am I just some lucky hunter that doesnt experience massive hunter pressure while experiencing good to great hunting most years?

I'd love to see mandatory reporting with a large, required questionnaire- units hunted, seasons hunted, days hunted, animals harvested, and whether or not on public land. However, that would honestly be for my own selfish reason to have better date for my own research purposes. I'd love to find a way to ease the mule deer buck hunting pressure in regions 6 and 7 and so far I haven't found a great solution that wouldn't have massive unintended consequences. The best I can come up with is very limited mule deer doe harvest restricted to private land only, and making residents and nonresidents choose a region that they can only hunt. I dont play the non res blame again and dont buy it for a second. I hate that because it would really limit my own hunting, but I do know it could significantly limit some pressure. As far as general elk hunting goes, you could have a year-round season, and most would give up in a few days and arent tough enough to go where elk go and pack one out.

The one thing that I do know for a fact is, these animals are so dang smart and crafty and their will to live is extraordinary. Their ability to adapt to new technology as well as avoid any sort of detection is incredible to observe. Spending the last 15 years of my life studying maps, reports, these very forums and putting it all into use in the field has been so humbling, frustrating, and at times, rewarding. Another thing I know is, hunting for bull elk and big mule deer bucks is just freaking tough. It always has been and it always will be.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1959.jpeg
    IMG_1959.jpeg
    451.7 KB · Views: 173
  • IMG_3780.jpeg
    IMG_3780.jpeg
    637.1 KB · Views: 172
I am far from an expert here. I’ve hunted Montana 3 times with the NR combo. For me it’s a meat hunt (elk) with a side of deer hunting. I’m not much of an elk hunter but have been able to kill one each time. The pressure has been very manageable for the number of elk. The deer hunting has been mediocre. Lots of deer but few to no big ones. That being said I have not put a ton of effort into it, I have no doubt about the mature timber bucks you are seeing.

I think most of the complaints are coming from region 6/7, where deer are struggling and guys continue to show up from all over the state and all of the country, expecting it to be just like all the YouTube videos..

Honestly I am getting what I want from Montana (fairly easy and high success elk hunting) and can’t complain.
 
It depends on where you are. In four districts in the west, most of the deer died in 1994. We went from seeing 200-300 a day to I haven't seen a buck in 5 years. In one district, I did not see a deer track in 16 days on horseback.

The blowdown in a couple districts has changed the migration patterns. Warmer weather patterns in the last 4-5 years has made it very difficult to even locate where the elk are at. Especially this year. The habitat didn't change but there were no elk at any of the upper elevations and after seeing them all summer they just dissapeared. Kitties? Wolves ? No one knows?
 
The blowdown in a couple districts has changed the migration patterns. Warmer weather patterns in the last 4-5 years has made it very difficult to even locate where the elk are at. Especially this year. The habitat didn't change but there were no elk at any of the upper elevations and after seeing them all summer they just dissapeared. Kitties? Wolves ? No one knows?

I have seen this fairly often particularly in burns where the blow down gets so bad after 15-20 years. Also the hunting pressure gets bad in new burns. The elk are still present on public lands but they veer from their historical norms and it takes many years for people to catch on, particularly with out snow. They also seem to adapt to new technology changes very quickly. I can’t count how many people told me in the late 90s and early 2000s how easy it was to bugle bull elk in before the advent of the rangefinder and fast bows to 40 yds etc. I’m also seeing that now with people able to shoot long range with rifles and bulls tucking closer to timber.
 
The question that matters is not How bad or good is the hunting is in Montana, but is the long term trend steady, improving or declining. Where I live in SE MT the hunting is currently as poor as I have seen it, and I have hunting here for five decades. However as poor as the hunting currently is, I am much more concerned about the long term trend, Every decade I have hunted has been poorer than the one that preceded it. I would gladly trade the "good" years of 2018 in the last decade for the poorest of years in the 80's and 90's. The long term trend is the reason Mt needs to make some changes, not the current sorry state of affairs. The attitude of I can still find hunting that satisfies my expectations and wants is the same attitude of the market hunters of over a hundred years ago.
 
The question that matters is not How bad or good is the hunting is in Montana, but is the long term trend steady, improving or declining. Where I live in SE MT the hunting is currently as poor as I have seen it, and I have hunting here for five decades. However as poor as the hunting currently is, I am much more concerned about the long term trend, Every decade I have hunted has been poorer than the one that preceded it. I would gladly trade the "good" years of 2018 in the last decade for the poorest of years in the 80's and 90's. The long term trend is the reason Mt needs to make some changes, not the current sorry state of affairs. The attitude of I can still find hunting that satisfies my expectations and wants is the same attitude of the market hunters of over a hundred years ago.
I can say the same thing about Alaska. I moved to AK in the 80’s. I didn’t know how good I had it. Caribou were easy and plentiful, moose were easier (mostly because of any bull regs I think), and sheep hunting was pretty much a gimme and a 2-3 day effort. None of this is true anymore. At least that’s my perception. More pressure, better tools to access areas than before…..fishing is the same way….king salmon fishing in SC Alaska is almost non existent now.
 
The question that matters is not How bad or good is the hunting is in Montana, but is the long term trend steady, improving or declining. Where I live in SE MT the hunting is currently as poor as I have seen it, and I have hunting here for five decades. However as poor as the hunting currently is, I am much more concerned about the long term trend, Every decade I have hunted has been poorer than the one that preceded it. I would gladly trade the "good" years of 2018 in the last decade for the poorest of years in the 80's and 90's. The long term trend is the reason Mt needs to make some changes, not the current sorry state of affairs. The attitude of I can still find hunting that satisfies my expectations and wants is the same attitude of the market hunters of over a hundred years ago.
Agreed, that the mule deer hunting in r 6&7 needs major attention. However, that is not true for the rest of the state and the other species. Would you say the elk hunting and white tail hunting in SE is worse than before?
 
I can say with out a shadow of a doubt the general rifle elk hunting is better now than it was 15 years ago, general mule deer and white tail hunting in r3 and r5 is as good, elk hunting in SE mt is nearly the best in the world and unlimited sheep hunting is as good as it’s been in a very long time. Those are the areas and species that I’m extremely familiar with.
 
I can say with out a shadow of a doubt the general rifle elk hunting is better now than it was 15 years ago, general mule deer and white tail hunting in r3 and r5 is as good, elk hunting in SE mt is nearly the best in the world and unlimited sheep hunting is as good as it’s been in a very long time. Those are the areas and species that I’m extremely familiar with.
If the mule deer are maintaining in western MT, Why have so many Limited Entry units been established in the western part of the state in the last 25 years? Part of the problem in the east is because so many western MT residents head east and part of the reason they do is because they can not draw a tag were they used to hunt.
The quality of he bulls has started to slip a bit in recent years on the Forest. It is still very good, but most of the best bulls are not taken on the forest anymore, but from private or public close to private. Whitetail are going to be fine, recent out breaks of EHD have the numbers down, but I fully expect them to bounce back. Part of the issue for mule deer is when whitetail numbers tank from EHD, some hunters switch to mule deer.
 
This was an extremely refreshing post to read. Well stated and a glass half full thought process versus the typical NR blame for the average resident not being able to shoot 190” buck year after year during a weeks hunt. I think you hit a lot of nails on the head. The instant gratification that is so sought after today I think plays a large part, especially since Social media makes it look like everyone shoots a monster buck every year that people want a place to shift blame when their hunt doesn’t go exactly as planned.

I also really like that you pointed out that the majority of bucks will never live to see 160”, even if they die of old age and that comparing parts of MT to CO and WY is unrealistic. From my years of hunting in MT, this is especially true. While giants are out there, it’s a combination of age and genetics that make it a lot harder and rarer to find. There’s a lot more to it than NR are shooting all our young bucks and we need to restrict opportunity. I can promise you, there are no shortage of residents shooting young bucks also. And for those willing to work and think outside the box, there is still plenty of opportunity to harvest a deer 4 1/2yrs or older.

As for game animals evolving and learning to live smarter, this is absolutely true and spot on. During peak rut, I’ve seen mature mule deer bucks many times in R7 tend does the first 30min of light, as soon as the sun gets high enough they peel off and head to thick cover alone and let the forky have them for the day until the last few minutes of light. Guys will then glass said forky from their truck at noon and because a forky is tending 6 does they think there’s a major problem and FWP needs to do an overhaul of the system.
 
I can say with out a shadow of a doubt the general rifle elk hunting is better now than it was 15 years ago, general mule deer and white tail hunting in r3 and r5 is as good, elk hunting in SE mt is nearly the best in the world and unlimited sheep hunting is as good as it’s been in a very long time. Those are the areas and species that I’m extremely familiar with.
Without a shadow of doubt? 🤣

Regions are big but your experience and opinions about the last 15 years are different than mine.

There is without a shadow of a doubt that Montana is the land of wasted potential when it comes to hunting.
 
Also for convincing photographic evidence, a 130 mule deer and 320 bull elk isn’t helping your personal experience argument on how excellent things are for people that will get after it.

We are blessed to live in a state where you can go hunting 24/7/365 but the quality of hunting isn’t anything what it used to be, and could be so much better with better management.
 
Without a shadow of doubt? 🤣

Regions are big but your experience and opinions about the last 15 years are different than mine.

There is without a shadow of a doubt that Montana is the land of wasted potential when it comes to hunting.

Interesting as I imagined you would comment. 130 inch deer sure, but he’s 6-10 years old. Anyone with a bit of experience can see that with a scared Roman nose. The legislation the two of you push will never make that buck bigger. Much like the Bridger buck tag that hasn’t pumped out a 180 inch deer with consistency in years. Age isn’t the issue, inches are- winter range makes inches and I don’t see anyone attacking the development in the bridger foot hills for high scoring deers sakes. And it seems like one of you even promotes it.

That’s also a 356 bull so I digress..

I can understand the frustration as I hunt the gallatin canyon and all of the ranges I hunt are with in 2 hours of bzn, just like you. But you know the saying, can’t teach an old dog new tricks. Can’t just wack a 350 bull off of Spanish like days of old.

It does shock me that you don’t see the bucks, or buck tracks in those areas none the less find any sheds.

As far as the SE elk on the downward trend, there were no where near the number of 360”+ bulls killed on public land when I worked the Custer in 2016. Which honestly wrecks all credibility art once had to push an agenda that I constantly see being pushed by a forum that wrecked SE deer hunting to begin with.
 
The question that matters is not How bad or good is the hunting is in Montana, but is the long term trend steady, improving or declining. Where I live in SE MT the hunting is currently as poor as I have seen it, and I have hunting here for five decades. However as poor as the hunting currently is, I am much more concerned about the long term trend, Every decade I have hunted has been poorer than the one that preceded it. I would gladly trade the "good" years of 2018 in the last decade for the poorest of years in the 80's and 90's. The long term trend is the reason Mt needs to make some changes, not the current sorry state of affairs. The attitude of I can still find hunting that satisfies my expectations and wants is the same attitude of the market hunters of over a hundred years ago.

This is wisdom. Thank you for this.

In your opinion, what has caused the trend?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I can say with out a shadow of a doubt the general rifle elk hunting is better now than it was 15 years ago, general mule deer and white tail hunting in r3 and r5 is as good, elk hunting in SE mt is nearly the best in the world and unlimited sheep hunting is as good as it’s been in a very long time. Those are the areas and species that I’m extremely familiar with.

I'm very low on experience in the state compared to you but the 2 areas I elk hunted quite a bit definitely seemed better within the decade than they are now. NW corner of the state I really doubt is as good as it was 15 years ago. SW near the continental divide sure seemed a lot better when I was first there '17-19 than it was in the early 2020s.
 
I'm very low on experience in the state compared to you but the 2 areas I elk hunted quite a bit definitely seemed better within the decade than they are now. NW corner of the state I really doubt is as good as it was 15 years ago. SW near the continental divide sure seemed a lot better when I was first there '17-19 than it was in the early 2020s.
I’d second this… I had some great seasons in 19 and 21 in Montana.

Still had success in 23 but I saw far fewer elk. This year was even more disappointing but I blame that on some choices I made. That said compared to what I saw in 19 and 21, there was a noticeable decline in numbers.

This is referencing region 3 btw, and it’s a very big state. Is the winter of 22’ to blame? IDK, locals said it wasn’t that bad, but there was a perceptible shift.

That said, it’s still a great state to hunt. As others have said, people always look back on seasons past with rose colored glasses and no matter what western hunting is just plain work. It ain’t like social media.
 
Back
Top