Where to start......
I will try this way.
At the risk of calling you a hypocrite -may I present to you the following thread - where a fellow outdoor writer and podcaster of yours a "competitor" of yours if you will - is allowed to be called every name in the book - for what was some truly despicable behavior in the field (compounded by a whole bunch of other despicable behavior by other hunters) but yet
probably not illegal. However, referring to a person as an idiot for shooting a deer out the window of their truck (illegal or not) is somehow a capital offence? I'll look the other way on that for this one time.....
Does anyone know Aram Von Benedikt? He apparently writes for Outdoor Life. It appears that while hunting in Utah on a General Season rifle hunt he decided to steal a buck that was shot by another hunter and was actively getting tracked. It's all over the socials. He has a rebuttal story, but...
rokslide.com
This is really where the bullet meets the road for me as it were. The fact that someone would first - even consider shooting a deer out of the window of their truck - and then openly admit to shooting said deer out the window of their truck - even if it was legal is beyond the pale. That is one of the most unsportsmanlike, douchey, empathy lacking things you could possibly do as a hunter. How do you tell that story you your kids and friends? "Well, you see here kids, I rolled up on this giant buck in the truck and I slooowly rolled down the window and got my gun reeeeal steady on the mirror there - but I made sure to stop the truck first so I was legal!" Sorry, if you don't see that as one of the most unethical things you can do in the field and you are somehow a "voice" of the hunting community then things are indeed worse than I ever imagined. If that's hunting and you're a hunter then I am not.
I can't speak for IDFG and why you only got a warning - but it aligns with the sentiments of
@Idahowitzer comments about people getting warnings vs heavy fines and also mine on other threads whereby if you HADN'T stated it publicly you would have never been caught due to the utter lack of coverage. How many other people are out there shooting critters out of their vehicles in Idaho and NOT blabbing about it and not getting caught? That's the data no one seems to want to talk about. But more to the point, how are we not - as a hunting community - allowing window shooting to be a thing that doesn't get you excoriated from the hunting community entirely. You aren't a child, you aren't a new hunter, you should know better. How many other deer have you shot out the window of your truck in states where it is (sadly) legal? You should do better and know better.
You've tolerated my opinion? That's telling. I assume that the mix of idiot hunters on this forum matches the population afield at large. And I don't mind saying if you are the one that setting the example then I'm realizing it might actually be skewed even worse.
Do you realize how silly you sound saying you want to maintain a positive atmosphere in light of some of the threads, comments and not to mention the memes going up? Listen if you want to ban me, ban me. But spare us all the hand waving. If my absolute truths make you all uncomfortable, good. But it doesn't make me wrong and I'm starting to realize that there are more than just a few people squirming in their seats at the prospect of someone finally saying enough is enough and calling people out on their douchey behavior. The fish and game agencies certainly aren't going to. I'm positive that it's happening, and I'm positive there are people on here engaging in it and I'm positive if it continues things are going to get worse before they get better.
And despite the bootlickers you're apparently used to on this site, I'm damn sure positive that shooting a deer out of the window of your truck and bragging about it - regardless of whether it was technically legal or not - ranks up there as one of the most AVB-like, poor sportsmanship anti-ethical things even I've seen in the field and brother, I've seen a lot.
That positive enough for you?