Here in AZ id love to see some ballistic testing on our feral Donkeys. They are out of control. Damn feds have them protected
Are they wearing bulletproof vests?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Here in AZ id love to see some ballistic testing on our feral Donkeys. They are out of control. Damn feds have them protected
Full combat armor including helmetsAre they wearing bulletproof vests?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Us made armor or middle east? If the later, wouldn't be difficult to punch through.Full combat armor including helmets
They grow them pre rut (that’s peer reviewed fact)Are they wearing bulletproof vests?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Us made armor or middle east? If the later, wouldn't be difficult to punch through.
I think Caylen went off half-cocked on the issue based on information his Leupold friend gave him. Now he's just doubling down because it would take a lot of humility to admit he's not a font of information on this topic.
It tells me what kind of teacher he is, in a way. Some control their ego and would approach this as "This sounds crazy but I should nonetheless look into it in good faith because I owe that to my students." However he seems to take it as a challenge to his authority.
"Teacher" in the sense of being open to new information because he feels he owes it to his students to figure out if it's actually useful. He's very clear he hasn't done any droptesting and refuses to do it. It's also clear as day that he doesn't have even a basic understanding of it as I broke down in a previous reply. Which is weird since he claims he read up on it. People can conclude what they want about whether he was telling the truth.NO….You assume what kind of teacher he is from a response to something that he doesn’t believe in doing.
Hunters arguing about cartridge selection? Shocking!
Only a few have been willing to "admit that" everyone else seems to get very defensive about the subject for whatever reason. Usually the loudest ones on the subject are the folks with the least to zero experience even trying it. It's weird.At some point though the guys who claim smaller won't kill need to change their tune and say "I won't use X caliber, but I can see that smaller that X calibers seem to be highly effective".
Most of the time it's vague allusions to "non-ideal shots" so they don't have to say they want the option to shoot something in the ass and have the bullet exit the chest.Has there been anyone who said "smaller won't kill"?
It's kind of shocking how many people will brag about constantly attempting marginal shots on animals.Most of the time it's vague allusions to "non-ideal shots" so they don't have to say they want the option to shoot something in the ass and have the bullet exit the chest.
My favorite part of the podcast was when he said he would use "science," and we use magic and voodoo. But all he did was tell the story of magic and voodoo to justify his science. HAHA!
IKR!!??
At some point though the guys who claim smaller won't kill need to change their tune and say "I won't use X caliber, but I can see that smaller that X calibers seem to be highly effective".
For me, personally I wouldn't use less than 7mm for elk because I don't like in an elk abundant/easy to hunt state. So that said, I'm gonna use a big destructive 180g target or 160g frangible all copper bullet on elk. I want dead dead dead quick quick and the ability to land a 600yard shot with leftover HP(if thats my only option)
If I live in an easy to hunt elk state, I would probably move to a 6mm or possibly a 223 caliber bullet in the 77-100g range because I wouldn't be in the time crunch and expense of having to travel to hunt. For whitetail, if I was allowed, I'd use 223 ALLL day; but I can't, so I use a 6mm.
IKR!!??
At some point though the guys who claim smaller won't kill need to change their tune and say "I won't use X caliber, but I can see that smaller that X calibers seem to be highly effective".
For me, personally I wouldn't use less than 7mm for elk because I don't like in an elk abundant/easy to hunt state. So that said, I'm gonna use a big destructive 180g target or 160g frangible all copper bullet on elk. I want dead dead dead quick quick and the ability to land a 600yard shot with leftover HP(if thats my only option)
If I live in an easy to hunt elk state, I would probably move to a 6mm or possibly a 223 caliber bullet in the 77-100g range because I wouldn't be in the time crunch and expense of having to travel to hunt. For whitetail, if I was allowed, I'd use 223 ALLL day; but I can't, so I use a 6mm.
I dont know that I have seen anyone here say it but I have been told it a few times in person.Has there been anyone who said "smaller won't kill"?
I follow your thoughts very closely as well. I bring a 6 PRC with me on every hunt as a backup rifle. I killed a buck with it and it made a plenty good hole in him. I would absolutely hike up a mountain with full confidence to kill any deer/elk with that 6mm bullet out to a pretty good distance if need be.IKR!!??
At some point though the guys who claim smaller won't kill need to change their tune and say "I won't use X caliber, but I can see that smaller that X calibers seem to be highly effective".
For me, personally I wouldn't use less than 7mm for elk because I don't like in an elk abundant/easy to hunt state. So that said, I'm gonna use a big destructive 180g target or 160g frangible all copper bullet on elk. I want dead dead dead quick quick and the ability to land a 600yard shot with leftover HP(if thats my only option)
If I live in an easy to hunt elk state, I would probably move to a 6mm or possibly a 223 caliber bullet in the 77-100g range because I wouldn't be in the time crunch and expense of having to travel to hunt. For whitetail, if I was allowed, I'd use 223 ALLL day; but I can't, so I use a 6mm.
I noticed that too, I’m not going to disagree that a rutted up animal bulky with testosterone be it a deer , elk , sheep is bulkier, but heavier bones? ( is ridiculous)I listened to it. My hunting experience is limited to white tails as far as big game goes. I thought he brought up an interesting point on bone vs. caliber.
My take:
Joe was getting more emotionally invested in the subject as time went on.
He presented no “science” other than his experience and some dude named Jim from New Zealand.
I’ll bet a dollar he reads this site and has seen the “science” that has been posted in various threads.
He constianly mentions the “quartering shot”. I get it as most do, an animal will never present the perfect angle. Seems like all he gets is quartering shots maybe?
His kids use small calibers with his blessing. Seems sort of hypocritical.
Seemed to blast Steve Speck, who obviously knows how to hunt. And sounded like he hard a hard time believing Steves results.
I don’t mind JVB and listen regularly. He seemed stressed more so in this podcast, His FnL already suffering from Liver cancer, took a fall and is paralyzed from the neck down. So I’m sure that is weighing on him.
I noticed that too, I’m not going to disagree that a rutted up animal bulky with testosterone be it a deer , elk , sheep isn’t bulkier, but heavier bones?
Here is a elk scapula that has some 150gr TSX holes in them from a .308win , both Form & JVB are wrong in their position on bone structure ( Form said “ paper thin “ &
JVB ultra “heavy due to the rut “ ) in their prospective podcastView attachment 804479