roosiebull
WKR
Yet…….. Left 16 years ago...nobody has come after me.
Yet…….. Left 16 years ago...nobody has come after me.
Does anybody have like 100 horses standing around that they don't want anymore?
Because the only way to "scientifically" settle this is to tie them up, shoot them with various bullets, and time how long it takes them to actually die.
You'll want to be close to make sure that shot placement is perfect every time, 50 yards should do it. Use downloaded ammo so the bullets are impacting at long range velocities. Come up with a Garmin to chronograph each shot as it impacts.
Bullets: TMK, FMJ, Mono, and something with a picture of an elk on the box
Calibers: .223, 6.5, and 30 should be enough spread. You don't need multiple rifles, just interpret the data as "This is like a 308 at X hundred yards which is the same as a 300 Mag at 200 yards past that"
That's 12 combinations of bullet and rifle.
Eight horses shot with each combination equals 96. Eight should be enough to be statistically significant, and leaves 4 horses to haul wagons to the glue factory.
How well do these things stick to fur?
Maybe the horses could simulate game like moose and elk and the burros could be deer and antelopeNevada has thousands
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Horses in the rut develop armor plating. Something to take into consideration
... you to go find out for yourself.
So then what bullet and in what diameter, in your real life experience, would lead to "kill and retrieve" at 439 yards?But at what cost? Some people have no business shooting large game with a light caliber.
Someone who reads 2,593 posts accompanied by 11,439 pictures of the same thing about about how great a .223 is on elk at 439 yds that doesn't have the experience to understand what goes into making a well placed shot will likely wound and lose rather than kill and retrieve...
But at what cost? Some people have no business shooting large game with a light caliber.
Someone who reads 2,593 posts accompanied by 11,439 pictures of the same thing about about how great a .223 is on elk at 439 yds that doesn't have the experience to understand what goes into making a well placed shot will likely wound and lose rather than kill and retrieve...
That's for sure!Some people have no business shooting large game, with any caliber.
What does this mean? How exactly does shooting something larger make up for an inferior shooter?Some people have no business shooting large game with a light caliber.
Man you guys are some cold blooded killers!!! No way I could shoot a horse!!!
Man you guys are some cold blooded killers!!! No way I could shoot a horse!!!
Yes, I do.Does anybody have like 100 horses standing around that they don't want anymore?
Some people have no business shooting game with any caliber.
I've had great luck with 300 short whizz bang and 300 regular whizz bang. I have witnessed many die by 300 ultra whizz bang, but never personally got one. Bergers, Barnes and eld X have all done the trick. Tbh tho, ive never shot one at exactly 439 tho.So then what bullet and in what diameter, in your real life experience, would lead to "kill and retrieve" at 439 yards?
I think he was trying to make the ever tiring “more margin for error” fallacy argument, unless I read it wrong.I've had great luck with 300 short whizz bang and 300 regular whizz bang. I have witnessed many die by 300 ultra whizz bang, but never personally got one. Bergers, Barnes and eld X have all done the trick. Tbh tho, ive never shot one at exactly 439 tho.