Flawed thinking?

Joined
Nov 27, 2013
Messages
2,374
You hear alot about carrying expandable broadheads for long follow up shots (saw it today on my favorite youtube channel) on elk. The more I think about this, its pretty flawed thinking. Lets say you shoot an elk, it runs out to 40-50-60 yds and is looking back, or is walking slowly away but at a hard angle. At severe angles, do you think you can maximize your penetration using an expandable head? You will most likely being shooting at a hard quartering animal at best. If I know it's a bad shot, I will try to get an arrow into the elk at any angle possible and hopefully drive the arrow deep which seems counterproductive with a mechanical.

I'm batting 1 for 4 on follow up shots where the elk actually gave me a good broadside shot after an initial bad hit. All the rest were quartering to me, or hard away. One I jumped 3-4 times, and never had a good follow up shot angle and he was always 80-100 yds ahead of me. When I finally caught him in his last bed, it ended up being a close shot, but very hard angled. I don't see the logic in this though process.

Thoughts?
 
Back
Top