Eradication of Mule Deer on Catalina Island

Howl For Wildlife

FNG
Rokslide Sponsor
Joined
Mar 17, 2022
Messages
50
Killing Catalina is finally live.

This film started in 2023, when we learned that nearly 2,000 mule deer on Catalina Island could be eradicated and left to rot. What followed was two years of filming, interviews, documents, public meetings, and unanswered questions. We didn’t set out to make a documentary—but the deeper we went, the clearer it became that this story needed to be told in full.

On Monday, January 26th, we premiered Killing Catalina on Catalina Island. The screening was publicly advertised and open to the community. On the same day, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife approved the first step on the Conservancy’s new Restoration Management Permit—potentially authorizing the next phase of deer eradication. The public had not yet seen this film.

That timing matters.

This film isn’t about arguing over one population number, but we certainly prove a much more accurate approach. For much of it, we accept the Conservancy’s own estimate and ask a harder question: was the hunting program ever designed to succeed—and if not, how did eradication become the only answer? We also examine fire claims, vegetation, survey methods, and why transparency and public trust broke down along the way.

We respect the people who participated in this film—including those we disagree with. But respect doesn’t mean silence, and conservation doesn’t mean shutting the public out.

Please watch the film.
Share it.
And decide for yourself.

👉 Watch Killing Catalina now on YouTube


This conversation isn’t over—and it shouldn’t be.

Thank you for being part of this work,

Charles Whitwam
Founder, Howl For Wildlife
 

Attachments

  • YOUTUBE-1.jpg
    YOUTUBE-1.jpg
    266.1 KB · Views: 8
thanks @Howl For Wildlife for all the hard work on this @Sierra Hunter and I hunted out there DIY in 2024. I observed major 6 things. 1. The areas fenced off from the deer look the exact same (if not less lush) than the areas not fenced off 2. there are not deer everywhere. the island is not infested ect.. like whitetails in some area 3. There is bison crap and trials everywhere . 4 The island is not an untouched "pristine" wilderness there are 2 major cities, an airport and roads everywhere busy with tourist vehicles in the interior (non city area) 5. the hunt stimulates the economy for those who live on the island, we paid for a driver, food, lodging and more 6. it was the most beautiful hunt i've ever gone on. I glassed up dolphins lol. It would be a shame to loose this for ever.

Deer/ocean view
IMG_3281.jpg
Roads
IMG_3263.jpg
Bison
IMG_3268.jpg
 
thanks @Howl For Wildlife for all the hard work on this @Sierra Hunter and I hunted out there DIY in 2024. I observed major 6 things. 1. The areas fenced off from the deer look the exact same (if not less lush) than the areas not fenced off 2. there are not deer everywhere. the island is not infested ect.. like whitetails in some area 3. There is bison crap and trials everywhere . 4 The island is not an untouched "pristine" wilderness there are 2 major cities, an airport and roads everywhere busy with tourist vehicles in the interior (non city area) 5. the hunt stimulates the economy for those who live on the island, we paid for a driver, food, lodging and more 6. it was the most beautiful hunt i've ever gone on. I glassed up dolphins lol. It would be a shame to loose this for ever.

Deer/ocean view
View attachment 1012713
Roads
View attachment 1012711
Bison
View attachment 1012712
I really wanted to go hunt there! Too busy working on the documentary!
 
I laughed out loud at how the Conservancy people reacted when the documentarian addressed the bison population. I'm glad he dug into that point without jumping to too many conclusions. Reading between the lines, it's obvious that they are planning on propagating bison because they are a sexy tourism draw.

Before this point arose, I was neutral on this issue; maybe the PhDs at the Conservancy have good and honest reasons to want all these non-native browsers eliminated to protect the ecosystem. But if you are going to allow bison I can't possibly see how you can say there is a scientific justification to extirpate deer, which are much less destructive grazers. For me this really exposed the hypocrisy; they are more like a gardening club (on behalf of the family that owned/owns Catalina) that wants a pretty island they can sell tourists on than a true nature-first org. Now I am 100% with all of the Catalina locals who want to see the deer population continue.

Finally, the idea that mule deer, freaking mule deer, can't be kept in check by hunting is mind-bogglingly dumb. WE NEARLY ELIMINATED THEM FROM LARGE SWATHS OF THE LOWER 48 THROUGH HUNTING! You think we can't kill enough of them on a dinky little island to keep their numbers in check? I refuse to believe that these Conservancy scientists are that dumb, they are obviously willfully ignorant.
 
Catalina deer being equipped with bullet proof hides would be the only plausible reason that hunting cannot keep deer populations at a given level.
 
I laughed out loud at how the Conservancy people reacted when the documentarian addressed the bison population. I'm glad he dug into that point without jumping to too many conclusions. Reading between the lines, it's obvious that they are planning on propagating bison because they are a sexy tourism draw.

Before this point arose, I was neutral on this issue; maybe the PhDs at the Conservancy have good and honest reasons to want all these non-native browsers eliminated to protect the ecosystem. But if you are going to allow bison I can't possibly see how you can say there is a scientific justification to extirpate deer, which are much less destructive grazers. For me this really exposed the hypocrisy; they are more like a gardening club (on behalf of the family that owned/owns Catalina) that wants a pretty island they can sell tourists on than a true nature-first org. Now I am 100% with all of the Catalina locals who want to see the deer population continue.

Finally, the idea that mule deer, freaking mule deer, can't be kept in check by hunting is mind-bogglingly dumb. WE NEARLY ELIMINATED THEM FROM LARGE SWATHS OF THE LOWER 48 THROUGH HUNTING! You think we can't kill enough of them on a dinky little island to keep their numbers in check? I refuse to believe that these Conservancy scientists are that dumb, they are obviously willfully ignorant.
As someone who has hunted out there, the reason they believe hunting isn't effective is largely due to the logistical nightmare hunting out there is. Its more of a lack of hunting opportunity problem then lack of hunting effectiveness problem. There could be a lot more hunting out there (especially since its so close to the large metro populations of SoCal). If you go guided you are golden, if you don't its tough. For example, you are allowed to camp in the interior, just not with weapons. If they changes this, it would make hunting out there so much easier. We had to hire a transported to take us into the interior and pick us up everyday. Their draw system was tough to understand as well, it seemed like the conservancy was trying to figure it out as well. We also had to purchase firearms negligence insurance. It was a total nightmare to put all the pieces of the puzzle together to make it happen DIY.

They could host a big camp. Make all hunters pay $______ to hunt out there/be part of the camp. Knock back the deer population and generate revenue for the conservancy. Lot of ways to skin this cat that don't involve slaughtering the deer. Pretty simple...
 
As someone who has hunted out there, the reason they believe hunting isn't effective is largely due to the logistical nightmare hunting out there is. Its more of a lack of hunting opportunity problem then lack of hunting effectiveness problem.
Thanks for shining some light on this. Sounds like a rule change to allow camping with guns if you are in possession of a valid deer tag would be an easy middle-ground solution. Or just permit more guides.
 
Back
Top