@Formidilosus
From the Sierra website...
"While they are recognized around the world for record-setting accuracy, MatchKing® and Tipped MatchKing® bullets
are not recommended for most hunting applications. Although MatchKing® and Tipped MatchKing® bullets are commonly used for varmint hunting, their design will not provide the same reliable explosive expansion at equivalent velocities in varmints compared to their lightly jacketed Hornet, Blitz or Varminter counterparts."
If the TMK was such a lethal big game round and so widely praised for nuking "thousands" of antelope, moose, elk, etc..., why doesn't Sierra explicitly market this bullet as such? Seems to me the manufacturer should have some expertise, albeit maybe not as much as you, and that they are missing out on significant market share to us lemmings that believe in tried and true cartridges explicityly designed for big game.
how much do you think sierra has tested their TMK's on game? like any other industry almost, they build to a spec for a purpose and market it in that arena, they are still a matchking, but that tip (accidentally on their part) made them a reliable expanding bullet on game and turned them into an effective projectile.... ELD-M aren't a hunting bullet either, yet they are the bullet of choice for many, because they work better than "hunting" bullets for what they do.
would you trust the company who builds a match bullet and leaves it at that, or someone who has killed a bunch of critters with them and watched a bunch more killed with them? i guess the answer lies in your agenda, because if it fit yours, of course you would believe experience over assumption from a company... they built a match bullet, why would they test it on game? they literally (from my understanding) added a plastic tip to a matchking, they didn't know that would result in consistent results on game, and they aren't going to invest in testing, because they already make hunting bullets.
if you want to take marketing and treat it as gospel, while ignoring experience, well..... you are what capitalism relies on to thrive, which is ironic in this context.
entertaining thread though.... especially the last few pages that became even more ironic. if you shoot a big enough cartridge for elk, you only have to shoot it a couple times per year, which is better than someone who shoots a smaller cartridge and shoots it a bunch.
i also shoot my bow every day with very few exceptions (usually 2-3 times per day) and i shoot the bow i'm hunting with exactly as it is when i hunt with it (quiver on, 4 arrows in the quiver+the one on the string)
i don't care what weapon i'm hunting with, but i want to be well practiced with that particular weapon, a few thousand rounds from my 17 shooting rats doesn't cut it for me... it's fun, and good practice, but it doesn't take the place of shooting the rifle i'm hunting with.... certainly tougher recently with ammo and reloading supplies hard to get, but i have been able to find some primers/powder/bullets by shopping a little every morning and evening.... doesn't make it easy, but also not a valid excuse to not practice