Deer cartridges with minimal recoil

Wood stocks are known to do this. I have seen it many times. That is the one of the most important reasons that people prefer a synthetic stock.
Perhaps...but synthetic stocks are just so butt ugly. ;) And I like the feel of wood better. I've not had any issues with wood stocks, but I do understand the functional advantages of synthetic stocks.
 
One option would be to buy the Howa Mini barreled action in 6mm Arc (which is remarkably benign to shoot from a recoil and concussion standpoint). Then order a laminated wood stock from Boyd’s. These stock have reasonable aesthetics if you like wood, several have adjustable LOP, they are significantly more impervious to humidity & weather, and they are cheap. Only downside for most is they are heavy… which would help dampen the recoil.

I have always found the 243 to have a sharp recoil (subjective) and have more concussion… probably one of my least favorite cartridges.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Not for OP who stated he would shoot low recoiling factory rounds.
Yeah, I guess that's where I was getting confused. I'm not seeing any factory ammo over 100 grains, so 10 twist should be good to go for me. And all the factory ammo should fit in a short action.
 
What scope are you looking to mount on it?
Probably a Trijicon Huron 3-9 X 40 using the UM rings on the integral dovetail.

And going to try the 95 gr Nosler Ballistic Tip/Winchester Ballistic Silvertip and the 90 gr Hornady ELDX. Hopefully one of those will shoot well in it. These are available in factory loads. I don't hand load.
 
Probably a Trijicon Huron 3-9 X 40 using the UM rings on the integral dovetail.

And going to try the 95 gr Nosler Ballistic Tip/Winchester Ballistic Silvertip and the 90 gr Hornady ELDX. Hopefully one of those will shoot well in it. These are available in factory loads. I don't hand load.

My favorite factory load for 243 on deer has been the Barnes 85gr TSX. I have not killed anything past 200 yards, but within the ranges that I have hunted, it has worked very well.

IMG_6256.jpeg
 
It arrived on Friday. I realize that a classic cartridge (.243) in an old-school walnut stock is probably boring to a lot of the folks on this forum, but it's exactly what I was looking for and I couldn't be happier with the purchase (assuming it has mild recoil and shoots/functions well). And I even think it has a pretty decent looking piece of walnut on it for a $750 gun.

IMG_2086.jpg
 
It arrived on Friday. I realize that a classic cartridge (.243) in an old-school walnut stock is probably boring to a lot of the folks on this forum, but it's exactly what I was looking for and I couldn't be happier with the purchase (assuming it has mild recoil and shoots/functions well). And I even think it has a pretty decent looking piece of walnut on it for a $750 gun.

View attachment 841633

Can’t wait to hear how it shoots!
 
Just curious about something...

Since I went with the legacy .243 cartridge over the 6ARC/6Creed, and I opted for the walnut/blued* steel instead of plastic/stainless, etc...am I still considered a totally irredeemable Fudd?

Or...does the fact that I went with a Tikka, opted for a Trijicon over a Leupold, and will be shooting NBTs/ELDXs instead of Core-Lokts...gain me some points towards redemption?

Heck, I'm even seriously considering using 10 round groups (without letting the barrel cool) instead of 3 round groups when I sight it in. So, that's got to count for something. ;)

Just kidding...I'm really glad I stumbled across this forum, and I have learned (and had to unlearn) a great deal of information in a relatively short time. I appreciate all of the great guidance and feedback I have received here.

(*more of a black than blue)
 
Back
Top