Eco-terrorist CO Land Board Director seeks to kill land sale and block public access

Joined
Jul 17, 2017
Messages
851
Noted eco-terrorist and recently appointed CO Land Board Director Nicole Rosmarino is attempting to block a sale of CO Trust Lands (La Jara Basin ~45k acres) to USFS, BLM, and CPW. If the sale is blocked it would shut out public access to over 45k acres and Coloradans would lose $40 million in Land and Water Conservation Fund money that has been allocated to the sale in support of conservation, hunting, angling, and outdoor recreation.

CO Land Board votes on this at the Thursday, Nov 13 meeting. Unfortunately, they just closed written public comment but in-person and zoom during the meeting is still available.

The whole thing stinks as the Land Board refused to speak on the matter when approached by news outlets, referring them to the Gov's office and the Gov's office referred them back to the Land Board. My suspicions are Rosmarino is teeing up La Jara for a private sale to some of her wealthy "Rewilding" folks and their environmental land trust. Thereby blocking any public access along with consumptive and non-consumptive use.

 
It’s kinda confusing what’s going on with this (or I’m confused anyway ) but I hope this always stays in public hands. It’s an absolutely breathtaking place. And great hunting and fishing too!! IMG_2286.jpegIMG_2273.jpegIMG_2281.jpeg
 
Colorado’s anti hunting governor Polis appointed Rosmarino a well known eco crazy as the head of Colorado’s land board. Polis did this appointment just recently in June just months before the land sale transfer vote was to take plasce. Sounds as though Polis appointed Rosmarino without a selection committee . Now it is being mentioned Rosmarino is targeting a private sale of the land to a billionaire, leaving Coloradoan’s high and dry. Sounds similar to Denver’s mayor Penya selling his own personal land he had just acquired to the new site for Denver International Airport way the hell in the middle of nowhere. Polis is a crook and can’t be trusted.
 
Interesting issue. I think we can all agree that the right move is a balance of protecting the landscape, recreational access, and money for Colorado schools (the Land Board's mandate).

A few folks have mentioned a potential sale to a private, anti-hunting interest. Has the Land Board made similar sales of land to private anti-hunting groups in the past? Are there evidence that this is what they are seeking to do here?
 
Back
Top