HaydenLane
WKR
I’m in North Dakota. While I’ve had good luck in the lottery, there’s a lot a would change.
I would prefer to see a preference point system as opposed to our current bonus points for deer (and pronghorn). Maybe 25% set aside for random draw, like Montana does for NR (or everyone? Really not sure how MT works for res).
Bow tags are OTC, statewide, and in addition to other tags. Personally, I think people should have to choose. I’m fine with them being statewide, but draw odds would improve immensely if hunters had to choose between rifle or bow, or make it a single tag valid for both seasons. We don’t have the game populations to meet tag demands (for antlered, at least) as is, so allowing people to take a rifle buck, and potentially a badlands bow buck in the same year seems silly. They could get lucky and do this 3 years in a row. Some changes here could also allow for a larger allotment of NR tags.
Our bow season could certainly be shortened a bit, as well. It’s 4 months as is.
Elk, moose, and sheep being OIL is good, but the application costs need to go up significantly. Too many people who don’t even care draw, while serious hunters can apply their whole lives with no luck. Instituting a bonus point system here could help as well.
I don’t think these would be very popular ideas lol
Edit to say: if we had a booming population and high demand, I probably wouldn’t favor a PP system. Maybe I’d just rather see more weight in the bonus points, not sure. I am sure that it sucks seeing one person draw an any antlered 3+ years in a row, and their neighbor in the same unit go 3+ years without
I would prefer to see a preference point system as opposed to our current bonus points for deer (and pronghorn). Maybe 25% set aside for random draw, like Montana does for NR (or everyone? Really not sure how MT works for res).
Bow tags are OTC, statewide, and in addition to other tags. Personally, I think people should have to choose. I’m fine with them being statewide, but draw odds would improve immensely if hunters had to choose between rifle or bow, or make it a single tag valid for both seasons. We don’t have the game populations to meet tag demands (for antlered, at least) as is, so allowing people to take a rifle buck, and potentially a badlands bow buck in the same year seems silly. They could get lucky and do this 3 years in a row. Some changes here could also allow for a larger allotment of NR tags.
Our bow season could certainly be shortened a bit, as well. It’s 4 months as is.
Elk, moose, and sheep being OIL is good, but the application costs need to go up significantly. Too many people who don’t even care draw, while serious hunters can apply their whole lives with no luck. Instituting a bonus point system here could help as well.
I don’t think these would be very popular ideas lol
Edit to say: if we had a booming population and high demand, I probably wouldn’t favor a PP system. Maybe I’d just rather see more weight in the bonus points, not sure. I am sure that it sucks seeing one person draw an any antlered 3+ years in a row, and their neighbor in the same unit go 3+ years without
Last edited: