Considering downsizing to 6 cm from 7 PRC

Drawing logical conclusions doesn't seem to be your strong suite. Nothing you have provided shows that the ballistic pressure waves decreases incapacitation times from tissue damaged beyond the permanent wound cavity (expect for CNS like the spine), all that they're showing is that it's measurable and can cause damage.
It's a tough pill to swallow when someone realizes they are not as well informed and/or as smart as believed. I know, as it happens to me. Frequently.
 
who cares -
Drawing logical conclusions doesn't seem to be your strong suite. Nothing you have provided shows that the ballistic pressure waves decreases incapacitation times from tissue damaged beyond the permanent wound cavity (expect for CNS like the spine), all that they're showing is that it's measurable and can cause damage.
you have no ability to understand or interpret data. it absolutely does and nearly states it verbatim. - be stupid on someone else’s time
 
Negative sir. He initially posted his response on that post at 9:53am my time (8:53am his time). I quoted his initial response at 9:57, see below. He went back and edited it at 10:04am. And then stated in post #222 that it was there the whole time. It was not.




View attachment 807385

Liars lie like liars lay.

Jay
Fanboys take it like fanboys take it. Typical man bun millennial response from someone who either was beaten as a child or not beaten enough.
 
who cares -

you have no ability to understand or interpret data. it absolutely does and nearly states it verbatim. - be stupid on someone else’s time
Hahah. Please show where it states verbatim ‘liquifies tissue’ or whatever mythical properties you think more energy has.
 
Ok so @Formidilosus - You are a bully and will continue to be. You can waste someone else’s time.

Here I wrote your next paragraph for you sir. You're welcome.

What have you noticed today? I noticed that if you outline the eyes, nose, and mouth on your face with your finger, you make an "I" which makes perfect sense, but is something I never noticed before. What have you noticed today?
 
Last edited:
I never said liquify tissue as one of my premises so nope. try again

In a world where cats ruled the office, productivity was at an all-time high, but not for the reasons you might expect. The feline managers enforced strict napping policies, ensuring that employees took multiple breaks throughout the day to recharge. Meetings were often interrupted by impromptu laser pointer chases, and the only form of communication was via Post-it notes stuck to the backs of unsuspecting colleagues. Despite the chaos, or perhaps because of it, morale was through the roof. After all, who could resist a workplace where the dress code consisted of fuzzy slippers and the employee of the month was always a tabby named Mr. Whiskers?
 
I hear you

As stated - my premise has never been that a big enough hole in something kills it.

My argument is: adding large amounts of kinetic energy around the hole increases the odds of killing exponentially. Additionally, when the hole may not be perfectly placed, the large amount of energy may have a killing result when it is large enough and powerful enough to damage the organs and create shock to the system. shutting down the nervous system and in some cases liquifying the organs.

Matching was never the idea. The OP was considering going from a 7 to a 6mm. the two photos were not meant to directly compare a bunch of the same. They were meant to support that staying with bigger bullets for hunting will penetrate better, transfer more energy, and damage more tissue than smaller.

I never said liquify tissue as one of my premises so nope. try again
Last time I checked organs are tissue. You repeat so much nonsense I’m sure it’s hard to keep up with it all.
 
Back
Top