That's because elk populations in Idaho at least, have shifted to the urban/ag interface. They aren't killing more elk in the Frank, Selway, Clearwater, or Lolo as they were pre 95 wolf introduction.I'm assuming a lot of decisions are being made based on studies such as this:
Wolves, Big Game, and Hunting – 8.001 - Extension
At a statewide level, wolves are unlikely to have a major impact on overall big game populations or hunting opportunities in Coloradoextension.colostate.edu
It states that in WY, ID, and MT where wolves are present - the elk population and hunter harvests have mainly increased.
I don't know what to make of this because everywhere I listen, and also the common sense meter tells me that both should decrease. How would the introduction of wolves NOT have an impact, I have no clue.
My point being is that it would be great to have some factual (not anecdotal) information to refute these studies. It's easy to have an emotional response but that won't get us very far unfortunately.
Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk