Background:
I currently have two rifles.
This is a 10 shot group from my AR with factory 73 ELDM w/ a mv of 2878 fps.
223 Hesitancy:
I’m a somewhat new western hunter and a beginner shooter. I’m convinced that 223 is adequate for my hunting needs. Something that makes me hesitant is that I hunt with outfitters about once a year. I foresee the possibility of an outfitter thinking it is laughable to use 223 on elk, deer, etc. and forbidding me to use it on a hunt. At that point, I’m stuck with using a loaner rifle or my 308.
I know this might sound stupid, and I could argue, “if I’m paying for the hunt, I should get to use whatever legal rifle I prefer.” But I also believe the outfitter should have final say on the way he runs his hunts.
I also live in CA, and I do solo backpack hunts here. My ammo choice is limited to monos or DRT. Here is a 10 shot group from my AR with DRT.
I can’t buy a suppressor and I don’t want to use a muzzle break. My only option for reducing recoil is stock geometry and increasing rifle weight. I also do not reload. As I see it, here are my two options.
The Options:
A) 223 Tikka Stainless
SHV 4-14x50 F1 Mil
UM Low Rings
Vertical grip
B) 6.5 Creedmoor Tikka CTR 20”
SHV 4-14x50 F1 Mil
RokStok
T3x bottom metal
Nightforce Low rings
Atlas Bipod
C) Neither
Buy ammo and use the 223 AR when you can and 308 when you can't
I’ve estimated option B would be around 10.5 lbs. This weight plus the RokStok geometry would help with spotting impacts better than my current 308, but I doubt as much as shooting a 223.
Question:
Should I get a 6.5 cm for hunting with outfitters and use my AR for practice/solo hunting until I get the 223 tikka? Or get the 223 tikka first? Let me know what you guys think.
I currently have two rifles.
- 308 Win Weatherby Vanguard
- 223 Aero Precision AR - 8 twist 16” barrel
This is a 10 shot group from my AR with factory 73 ELDM w/ a mv of 2878 fps.
223 Hesitancy:
I’m a somewhat new western hunter and a beginner shooter. I’m convinced that 223 is adequate for my hunting needs. Something that makes me hesitant is that I hunt with outfitters about once a year. I foresee the possibility of an outfitter thinking it is laughable to use 223 on elk, deer, etc. and forbidding me to use it on a hunt. At that point, I’m stuck with using a loaner rifle or my 308.
I know this might sound stupid, and I could argue, “if I’m paying for the hunt, I should get to use whatever legal rifle I prefer.” But I also believe the outfitter should have final say on the way he runs his hunts.
I also live in CA, and I do solo backpack hunts here. My ammo choice is limited to monos or DRT. Here is a 10 shot group from my AR with DRT.
I can’t buy a suppressor and I don’t want to use a muzzle break. My only option for reducing recoil is stock geometry and increasing rifle weight. I also do not reload. As I see it, here are my two options.
The Options:
A) 223 Tikka Stainless
SHV 4-14x50 F1 Mil
UM Low Rings
Vertical grip
B) 6.5 Creedmoor Tikka CTR 20”
SHV 4-14x50 F1 Mil
RokStok
T3x bottom metal
Nightforce Low rings
Atlas Bipod
C) Neither
Buy ammo and use the 223 AR when you can and 308 when you can't
I’ve estimated option B would be around 10.5 lbs. This weight plus the RokStok geometry would help with spotting impacts better than my current 308, but I doubt as much as shooting a 223.
Question:
Should I get a 6.5 cm for hunting with outfitters and use my AR for practice/solo hunting until I get the 223 tikka? Or get the 223 tikka first? Let me know what you guys think.
Last edited: