Bullet choice for cow elk

rrstein82

FNG
Classified Approved
Joined
Nov 21, 2020
Messages
41
Heading out to Chama, NM on Monday for late season cow hunt. Taking my Springfield Waypoint in 6.5 creedmoor (I shoot it better than my heavier caliber rifles). Rifle shoots both Hornady 143 gr ELD-X and Barnes LRX 127 gr very well. Any thoughts on which is a better choice? Leaning towards the ELD-X just because it's heavier...
 
Joined
Sep 5, 2012
Messages
742
Location
Gypsum, CO
Actually had a hornady rep tell me that the ELD-X bullet is a great long range bullet, and if you have a perfect broadside shot into the heart area on elk sized game it performs amazing. But anything less than a a perfect broadside shot and it does not perform nearly as well. They had failures in testing with quartering shots and thick bone. I’ve gone to Barnes bullets myself the TTSX, I used to shoot Hornady rounds but had a lot of failures with them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

UtahJimmy

WKR
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
884
Location
SLC, UT
Since you said they both shoot well; of those 2 choices I'd go with the lrx.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2016
Messages
733
Location
Eastern Washington
Initial weight is more with the ELD-X but it won't retain nearly as much as it travels through an animal. You can plan on maybe %40 weight retention with the ELD-X and around %90 with the LRX. Apples to apples the heavier bullet will penetrate better than a light bullet, but these two bullets are more like comparing apples to watermelons. The ELD-X will be fine as long as you're taking perfect broadside shots and doing the best you can to avoid heavy bones or muscles. The LRX will give you a little insurance on reaching the vitals if you screw up.
 
Joined
Oct 8, 2019
Messages
2,956
Am pleasantly surprised no one has told you that any bullet from a 6.5 CM will bounce off an elk.

Killed a water buffalo once (unplanned) using commercial 178 gr ELD-X in my 308 Win. It was a decent size; deformed a half inch gambrel. No issues going through meat and bone with the two shots that I took; vitals were trashed and was a pretty quick kill.

Looking at my water buffalo and my 370” bull elk mounts on the wall; both are shoulder mounts. My bull is about 15” across whereas the water buffalo is about 21” across.

I am thankful that:
1) I did not listen to the experts and
2) the water buffalo did not identify as an elk.

Run whichever bullet gives you the warm fuzzies.
 

bdan68

WKR
Joined
Feb 1, 2017
Messages
337
Location
Washington
The Barnes for sure. I shot two doe mule deer this year, both about 300 yards with a 30/06 and 178 grain Hornady ELX bullets. Killed them just fine, but the bullets didn't exit on either one, and both were broadside behind the shoulder shots. I definitely won't be trusting that bullet on an elk hunt.
 
Joined
Sep 5, 2012
Messages
742
Location
Gypsum, CO
LRX

I took a cow at 711 yards this year with my 6.5cm using that round. Even at that distance, bullet went thru both sides.

At 700 yards that bullet is moving like 1800FPS, ur pushing the limits to get any expansion at all. Did the bullet hit any bone?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Joined
Nov 20, 2021
Messages
1,552
Well, since you headed out on Monday which is today, anything since the early posts is not gonna do you any good for advice. I hope you took the Barnes.

For discussion, there is "whopping" 16 grains of difference between those two bullets, lol. The Barnes will hold on to about everyone of them no matter it is angled through the animal. I cannot say the same for the other bullet which will lose close to half or more on initial expansion out to medium range. Just a fact. That gives the most options for shot angle presentation close up or far away. Barnes is the hands-down choice (that I hope went on the hunt) in my opinion.
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2021
Messages
21
Thanks for all these great case studies. I always find people’s field reports of bullet performance to be way more informative than any of the manufacturer’s stats, even though it’s just anecdotal evidence.
 

Laramie

WKR
Joined
Apr 17, 2020
Messages
2,632
To the OP, please let us know how the hunt went.

I'm not a fan of either choice but am curious what you decided to take and how it worked.
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2016
Messages
984
Location
Fairbanks, Alaska
I killed two cows with a 6.5 cm shooting the 147 ELD-M's (which I understand to essentially be a less bonded -X) this year and I'll do it again with zero hesitation.
 
Joined
Feb 2, 2013
Messages
14
I have had good luck with the eld-x in my 30-06. 2 elk (bull and cow) 1 moose (bull) and 2 mule deer (buck and doe). 2 had exit holes, recovered most of bullet under the opposite hide on 2, and had no exit and it appeared bullet had nearly total fragmentation. No experience with Barnes, but I’ve had great luck with Nosler products
 
Joined
Oct 23, 2021
Messages
14
Started shooting the 143gr eld-x this season due to not having many other options. Shot a cow at 200 yards, destroyed the right ventricle, she went about 10 yards before falling over. I would think if you take a good shot it will get the job done.
 

A382DWDZQ

WKR
Joined
Dec 3, 2021
Messages
734
At 700 yards that bullet is moving like 1800FPS, ur pushing the limits to get any expansion at all. Did the bullet hit any bone?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Minimum expansion for a .277 cal 129gr LRX is 1,400 fps. The LRX expand at lower velocities, and would assume that .264 127gr LRX would be either comparable or better with a slightly higher BC. The 130gr .308 cal TTSX on the other hand is 1,800 fps. There are other weight/BC of TSX and TTSX that have varying minimum impact thresholds. Hit up Barnes customer service and they will let you know.
 
Top