I finally figured out what it is that makes me uneasy about this.
To me that was a marginal shot. It worked fine this time, but there are lots of places an equal distance from what I'd assume was POA that would not have gone well.
An error of the same magnitude in a different direction could have resulted in a poor outcome, and the follow up shot was further off, not corrected/closer.
It's being represented as "not perfect, but good enough for a dead bull." I think a better representation would, if this must be shared, be "there was substantial error on this shot, but it happened to be in a direction that resulted in quick incapacitation. Not great, but lucky enough for a dead bull."
To me that was a marginal shot. It worked fine this time, but there are lots of places an equal distance from what I'd assume was POA that would not have gone well.
An error of the same magnitude in a different direction could have resulted in a poor outcome, and the follow up shot was further off, not corrected/closer.
It's being represented as "not perfect, but good enough for a dead bull." I think a better representation would, if this must be shared, be "there was substantial error on this shot, but it happened to be in a direction that resulted in quick incapacitation. Not great, but lucky enough for a dead bull."