wapitibob
WKR
Of course he joined the discussion, the op was full of shit.
That's fine. No one is faulting him for doing that.He joined the discussion here, because he was publicly called out and eluded to that this petition is what made him change his mind, but it actually didn’t.
You are missing my point, he shouldn’t have had to. You could have posted and talked through the petition and rallied troops to stand against the Game and Fish. Which is where your true issue should be.That's fine. No one is faulting him for doing that.
I am not missing the point . . . I did post the petition and shared it in my circles. Its important to distinguish that I am not trying to stand against AZGFD, just trying to change a behavior which is contributing to a problem. I directed the petition to the dept, not Randy. But I shared it with him in an effort to be transparent.You are missing my point, he shouldn’t have had to. You could have posted and talked through the petition and rallied troops to stand against the Game and Fish. Which is where your true issue should be.
I commend your efforts. I believe Randy has good intentions. Most involved in the industry also have good intentions. The reality is you are trying to stop a waterfall with a screen. There is absolutely no going back.I am not missing the point . . . I did post the petition and shared it in my circles. Its important to distinguish that I am not trying to stand against AZGFD, just trying to change a behavior which is contributing to a problem. I directed the petition to the dept, not Randy. But I shared it with him in an effort to be transparent.
I didn't start this thread, as I wasn't a member here until yesterday, so I don't know what you are trying to suggest I do.
Someone posted about the petition, Randy commented on the petition and ME, so I chimed in.
Like I said before, if you don't get it, I can't help you.
So, should we just sit back and do nothing? Every little bit means something. OTC will be a thing of the past in the near future. Let's do everything possible to extend it as long as we can. Implementing % caps on non-res OTC, mandatory harvest reporting, % harvest thresholds on units can extend OTC's existanceI commend your efforts. I believe Randy has good intentions. Most involved in the industry also have good intentions. The reality is you are trying to stop a waterfall with a screen. There is absolutely no going back.
I didn't state that. As a resident of Az, this is good progress for you but it is really temporary in the grand scheme of things. Some are pining for a return the old days and would like to see demand drop. The reality is demand will continue to increase. Western state human populations are increasing and more residents are hunting. Even in Wyoming, resident pressure is significantly increasing. Individuals are not the cause. Dramatic increases in technology and electronic communication are. My point is, enjoy what we have and realize we are nearing the "end" of the good old days as we know it. In the mean time, fight the battles you can, as you mention, to prolong as long as you can.So, should we just sit back and do nothing? Every little bit means something. OTC will be a thing of the past in the near future. Let's do everything possible to extend it as long as we can. Implementing % caps on non-res OTC, mandatory harvest reporting, % harvest thresholds on units can extend OTC's existance
The focus on non-resident and resident numbers is splitting hairs. I get that the original topic was about non-resident hunters in AZ, but residents have equal access to YouTube. An advertisement is an advertisement. Maybe an equal or greater number of residents were fed the ads/videos and went out to hammer whatever species in whatever season. Same effect, pressure was increased when it could be argued it shouldn't have.Founder OYOA, is just being proactive and prior to the petition. I commend him for that foresight and concern of the resource.
as for percentage increase comparisons, BS.
The focus and concern for residents are numbers of hunters in the field. Looking at those numbers 1500+ more AZ residents purchased OTC archery deer tags and 500+ non-residents purchased those tags in the same time span. Thus, 3x more AZ residents entered the woods-deserts with OTC archery deer tags. More pressure is coming from residents than non-res.
and this year Jan-2022, I'll be one to switch to AZ resident...after hunting OTC archery AZ as non-resident for each of the past 18 years.
Books and coversI would hate to build a reputation as a great hunter and conservationist then actually get paid to hunt good public land areas to help spread hunting.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's not the number sold. It's the fact the double digit % increase of NR was a contributing factor in reaching the 20% success threshhold, thus shutting down units to draw only. That's what's at play here.It’s kind of laughable, around 90% of AZ otc tags are purchased by residents yet the NR is the problem due to influencers.
I mean out of 29,589 otc tags sold in 2020, 3,093 went to NR’s.
If you would bother reading multiple posts from myself and many other people, no one is just blaming Randy.... This particular thread is about influencers, so he is the subject. He is a very, very small part of the problem. The thing is, he realized he was going to contribute to the problem so he voluntarily cancelled his contract. I am not sure why some guys are ate up over this. He literally was cancelling his contract before the petition was even started. If he would have been public about his decision to do that, I doubt a petition ever gets started. He is a very public guy, not sure why he didn't want to talk about that.While it is true that NRs are intrinsically superior in most respects, including lethality (and this holds true outside of AZ... ), I gotta believe the concentration of animals around water during the drought played a major part to increase bow hunting kill rates over the past couple years.
in other words don’t just blame Randy?
So NR are more successful? If there is a 20% success rate that means 618 NR were successful out of 29,589 hunters or 2% overall or do you think 100% of NR were successful and only 2,825 residents were?It's not the number sold. It's the fact the double digit % increase of NR was a contributing factor in reaching the 20% success threshhold, thus shutting down units to draw only. That's what's at play here.