Drop Bear
FNG
Yes this topic is kind of an strange thing to worry about. But, it’s something that been on my mind so I’d be interested to hear some other hunter’s input. I’ll also be saying some things about both archery and rifle hunting, which are my feelings on the matter but may well not apply generally, so don’t be personally offended.
I Just got back from hunting Tahr. I took my compound, my friend took their rifle. Long story short, I had a bow shot which I totally blew because my rest had been knocked out of alignment. I then borrowed a rifle and shot an animal. This got me thinking; on the one hand I like that archery hunting demands a greater commitment to be successful, which is something I personally value. But on the other, all the complex accoutrements of the bow and all the fiddling with equipment is something I would prefer to minimise. In contrast, my friends rifle (a Swedish Mauser, a wonderful thing to use) was starkly simple. But it’s totally reasonable to shoot out past 300m with a rifle and the animal I shot was at 150m, which was an easy shot despite my less than ten round experience with a centrefire rifle. The ease of this seemed a little unethical to me, though I encourage others to do as they please.
I’m now wondering if I would be better off hunting with something like a Mauser, perhaps with iron sights, to simplify things so I can spend less time fiddling with gear, and more time doing what I like; hunting. Iron sights to level the playing field a little. But, in Australia, the legalities of owing a firearm are a nightmare which might tip the scales back in the other direction. Furthermore, a lot of public land hunting in my area is limited to bows. Traditional archery? Perhaps something I should investigate, but also a technical pursuit and demanding a lot of time for practice. Time isn’t something I have an abundance of.
I realise this isn’t really a question, more a dump of thoughts, but if anyone has an opinion on the matter, I’d love to hear it.
I Just got back from hunting Tahr. I took my compound, my friend took their rifle. Long story short, I had a bow shot which I totally blew because my rest had been knocked out of alignment. I then borrowed a rifle and shot an animal. This got me thinking; on the one hand I like that archery hunting demands a greater commitment to be successful, which is something I personally value. But on the other, all the complex accoutrements of the bow and all the fiddling with equipment is something I would prefer to minimise. In contrast, my friends rifle (a Swedish Mauser, a wonderful thing to use) was starkly simple. But it’s totally reasonable to shoot out past 300m with a rifle and the animal I shot was at 150m, which was an easy shot despite my less than ten round experience with a centrefire rifle. The ease of this seemed a little unethical to me, though I encourage others to do as they please.
I’m now wondering if I would be better off hunting with something like a Mauser, perhaps with iron sights, to simplify things so I can spend less time fiddling with gear, and more time doing what I like; hunting. Iron sights to level the playing field a little. But, in Australia, the legalities of owing a firearm are a nightmare which might tip the scales back in the other direction. Furthermore, a lot of public land hunting in my area is limited to bows. Traditional archery? Perhaps something I should investigate, but also a technical pursuit and demanding a lot of time for practice. Time isn’t something I have an abundance of.
I realise this isn’t really a question, more a dump of thoughts, but if anyone has an opinion on the matter, I’d love to hear it.