Anyone own both a NF SHV 4–14 X 50 and a Maven 1.2?

SDHNTR

WKR
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
7,915
If yes, could someone do me a solid? I would love to see a side-by-side picture of both reticles at 4X, looking at the same object, from the same distance.

I own the Maven now and can’t get used to it. The floating dot just disappears on me. I used to own the NF, and know it has a center crosshair, which I prefer, I just don’t recall if the rest of the reticle is as visible at low power, or worse.
 
8" steel, 250 yds, 4x on each scope. Added a few comparison pictures too, they are almost identical in size, SHV is ~1" longer.

View attachment 923338View attachment 923339View attachment 923340View attachment 923341
Hugely helpful. Thanks. Looks pretty comparable. Is that the Mil C on the NF? Assuming the illumination turned on would make the NF even more visible? The Maven only lights up the tiny center dot.

Which do you feel is more usable for a close, quick shot?
 
Hugely helpful. Thanks. Looks pretty comparable. Is that the Mil C on the NF?

Which do you feel is more usable for a close, quick shot?

I prefer the Maven, it is on the rifle I carry the most for coyotes, foxes, badgers, etc... The SHV is the MIL-R reticle. I find the bolder lines (esp vertical) on the Maven draw my eye to center better than the lighter lines on the SHV at lower powers/quicker close range shots. The Maven is on an AR, SHV on an X-Bolt; so use cases are definirely different. If I was expecting more use at closer ranges, I'd augment with a MRDS; but that is another conversation that isn't relevant on a big game rifle IMO.
 
This might be entirely obvious so excuse me if it is. But have you focused the diopter to your eye? I’ve owned both scopes. The Shv is definitely a little courser and more apparent at low magnification, but I much prefer the mavens reticle, personal opinion of course
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1961.png
    IMG_1961.png
    333.8 KB · Views: 1
Back
Top