- Banned
- #1
Where's Bruce?
WKR
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2013
- Messages
- 6,389
OMG...the series disclaimer urging viewers not to attempt this stuff is dead on. Some of the so-called survivalists don't even common sense much less expert training. I mean, who takes a down sleeping bag into a wet, freezing environment for use in a natural shelter? Two of em have soaking wet bags...I would be in my Wiggy's synthetic bag...it would keep ya warm if wet.
And this guy...WTF?
If you are prone to "anxiety attacks" then maybe you should not record your weaknesses for national television in surroundings you "cannot control." I mean almost losing his pot, soaking his sleeping bag, comparing himself returning Vietnam Veterans after "his suffering in Patagonia"...good God man, there is no comparison. NONE! Greg just talked about negatives for six days until he mourged himself out and pushed the button. If you intend to live in the wilderness in dismally adverse conditions you better have the right attitude and be goal driven. Otherwise stay home.
If you cannot erect a tarp in a way that it doesn't flap and/or develop lots of holes...you are no survival expert. What are you doing in Labrador in winter? Same goes for Mark who bailed on Day 5 cuz he missed his son. These "experts" are supposed to be seeking REDEMPTION from previous efforts on ALONE so we expect them to be more prepared, more resolved, more tenacious, more everything. But instead they come off looking like manginas. The women on the other hand have grit and healthier attitudes.
It makes me question if they intentionally place "certain people" on the show knowing full well they will cave quickly and provide contrast to those actually intending to last 50 days no matter what. Winter in Labrador is level 10 survival requiring common sense, smart planning and lots of stubbornness. I think there are Roksliders far better prepared to survive Labrador than some of these contestants and the producers want the anguish and suffering and complaining to make the show more watchable and increase ratings. Some of the contestants clearly have no business being there and will never achieve redemption. JMO, I could be wrong.
I hope a gal wins this one.
And this guy...WTF?
If you are prone to "anxiety attacks" then maybe you should not record your weaknesses for national television in surroundings you "cannot control." I mean almost losing his pot, soaking his sleeping bag, comparing himself returning Vietnam Veterans after "his suffering in Patagonia"...good God man, there is no comparison. NONE! Greg just talked about negatives for six days until he mourged himself out and pushed the button. If you intend to live in the wilderness in dismally adverse conditions you better have the right attitude and be goal driven. Otherwise stay home.
If you cannot erect a tarp in a way that it doesn't flap and/or develop lots of holes...you are no survival expert. What are you doing in Labrador in winter? Same goes for Mark who bailed on Day 5 cuz he missed his son. These "experts" are supposed to be seeking REDEMPTION from previous efforts on ALONE so we expect them to be more prepared, more resolved, more tenacious, more everything. But instead they come off looking like manginas. The women on the other hand have grit and healthier attitudes.
It makes me question if they intentionally place "certain people" on the show knowing full well they will cave quickly and provide contrast to those actually intending to last 50 days no matter what. Winter in Labrador is level 10 survival requiring common sense, smart planning and lots of stubbornness. I think there are Roksliders far better prepared to survive Labrador than some of these contestants and the producers want the anguish and suffering and complaining to make the show more watchable and increase ratings. Some of the contestants clearly have no business being there and will never achieve redemption. JMO, I could be wrong.
I hope a gal wins this one.