6mm Berger choices

SDHNTR

WKR
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
7,124
Berger’s marketing has always been frustratingly confusing to me. They need a complete refresh imo, but that’s besides the point. I think I have a handle the VLD target vs VLD hunting as that’s what I typically use when not using a mono, but what about the construction of the hybrid?

In the 6mm 105, there are vldh and hybrids. What is the difference in construction? I know the hybrid name is related to the shape/ogive tangent/secant, thus the name, but how does jacket thickness/construction compare?
 
OP
S

SDHNTR

WKR
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
7,124
ok, I see now that the 105 Hybrid is actually called “Hybrid Target”. I missed the target part before, which better explains things.

What a mess their terminology is. Why don’t they clean that up with clearly different names that are easier to understand?
 

Shortschaf

WKR
Classified Approved
Joined
Jul 29, 2020
Messages
705
ok, I see now that the 105 Hybrid is actually called “Hybrid Target”. I missed the target part before, which better explains things.

What a mess their terminology is. Why don’t they clean that up with clearly different names that are easier to understand?
Two word names.
First word is profile, second word is jacket type and/or use-case. Possibly the most meaningful and straightforward bullet naming convention on the market, but OKAY
 

Lawnboi

WKR
Joined
Mar 2, 2012
Messages
8,399
Location
North Central Wi
Ehh, Berger could probably ditch the whole vld line and still not be able to keep up.

105 hybrid is thee 6mm bullet. I’m not sure for hunting, but for shooting there is something special about that one.
 
OP
S

SDHNTR

WKR
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
7,124
Ehh, Berger could probably ditch the whole vld line and still not be able to keep up.

105 hybrid is thee 6mm bullet. I’m not sure for hunting, but for shooting there is something special about that one.
If a bullet is not a hunting bullet, it is of little interest to me. That’s the only reason I shoot bullets. Hunting or practicing to hunt.
 

Lawnboi

WKR
Joined
Mar 2, 2012
Messages
8,399
Location
North Central Wi
If a bullet is not a hunting bullet, it is of little interest to me. That’s the only reason I shoot bullets. Hunting or practicing to hunt.
I havnt used them but I know people do.

The 108 elite hunter has a similar hybrid profile. Worth a try.

I’m personally not a huge fan of what bergers do on deer but I won’t shoot anything else at targets.
 

TxLite

WKR
Joined
Sep 6, 2018
Messages
1,965
Location
Texas
If a bullet is not a hunting bullet, it is of little interest to me. That’s the only reason I shoot bullets. Hunting or practicing to hunt.
I haven’t used the 105’s but the hybrid target line are generally certified killers.

Much like the eld-m, which is also not a “hunting” bullet
 
  • Like
Reactions: WRO

Shortschaf

WKR
Classified Approved
Joined
Jul 29, 2020
Messages
705
Except for Elite Hunter. Or Juggernaut. Or OTM.
Elite hunters are still Hunting bullets that product page lists as hybrid ogive. And OTM are Open Tip Match. You got me on the Juggernauts.

In all seriousness, the 140 hybrid targets were terrible hunting bullets for me. Three deer in the lungs and little to no disruption in the offside lung on any. No clue how the 105 hybrid targets are
 

Odd1out

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Sep 6, 2023
Messages
175
Anyone have experience with the 115gr's?

Sent from my SM-G986W using Tapatalk
 
OP
S

SDHNTR

WKR
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
7,124
Elite hunters are still Hunting bullets that product page lists as hybrid ogive. And OTM are Open Tip Match. You got me on the Juggernauts.

In all seriousness, the 140 hybrid targets were terrible hunting bullets for me. Three deer in the lungs and little to no disruption in the offside lung on any. No clue how the 105 hybrid targets are
Forgot about the Classic Hunter too.

So what happened with the 140? I thought the targets had a thicker jacket, so how could it possibly destroy the onside lung and then fail to penetrate to the offside lung? Penciling through both would make more sense I would think.
 

huntnful

WKR
Joined
Oct 10, 2020
Messages
2,169
Hybrid Targets are killing machines. Don’t be swayed just by the names. It just has a slightly thicker jacket than their “hunting” bullets. It just makes for a slightly longer entrance length (which sometimes isn’t even the case) before it ruptures and destroys the vitals.

You are safe to use the hybrid targets or the Elite Hunter, EOL’s or VLD Hunter. They will all kill exceptionally
 
OP
S

SDHNTR

WKR
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
7,124
Hybrid Targets are killing machines. Don’t be swayed just by the names. It just has a slightly thicker jacket than their “hunting” bullets. It just makes for a slightly longer entrance length (which sometimes isn’t even the case) before it ruptures and destroys the vitals.

You are safe to use the hybrid targets or the Elite Hunter, EOL’s or VLD Hunter. They will all kill exceptionally
Oh boy. Another one! EOL!

And no one else thinks they need to clean up the terminology?

Nice buck there!
 

Shortschaf

WKR
Classified Approved
Joined
Jul 29, 2020
Messages
705
Forgot about the Classic Hunter too.

So what happened with the 140? I thought the targets had a thicker jacket, so how could it possibly destroy the onside lung and then fail to penetrate to the offside lung? Penciling through both would make more sense I would think.
My bad on the wording. Yes it penciled through both.

Bullet didnt disrupt/frag in any real manner through the animals is what I meant.

EOL's and Classic Hunters pencil onside lung and disrupt/frag afterward on everything Ive killed


ETA offside lung on one animal, and onside+offside lung on another with 140 hybrid targets
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2425.jpeg
    IMG_2425.jpeg
    478 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_2439.jpeg
    IMG_2439.jpeg
    458.5 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_2440.jpeg
    IMG_2440.jpeg
    483.5 KB · Views: 13
Last edited:
Top