Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Clear. But velocity and the mass of the ejecta (bullet + powder) still defines recoil. I doubt the difference in powder weight is sufficient to offset the increase in velocity. I would have said its a given that it’ll still recoil more than a standard creedmoor. Maybe less than a PRC, but still more than a creedmoor. In other words, from a performance standpoint id think this is a “low recoiling PRC”, not a “fast creedmoor”.
Any concerns with the higher pressure and barrel/throat erosion and life expectancy?
Physics is physics. None of these are hard recoiling, its more the cumulative effect for me.Look at this video and you can see three different 6.5CM rifles shot with regular ammo the new ammo.
Imo - the only time the 6.5CM looks like it kicks much is when he shot it from the insanely light Weatherby Capra rifle.
This seems to have you worked up in some way?Physics is physics. None of these are hard recoiling, its more the cumulative effect for me.
Guessing aside, I plugged numbers into a recoil calculator. A 140gr 6.5 using 45gr of powder to reach 2700fps in a 9lb gun generates a bit over 12.8ft/lb of recoil. At 3000fps (the claimed +300 fps) you have to drop to below 37gr of powder to have the same recoil. We cant know the actual recoil comparison for sure without having load data or the guns in hand. But suffice to say if it uses the SAME weight of powder it will recoil more. In this case it will recoil 14% more with the same powder charge weight. The question is how low can you get the charge weight. If PRC velocity is realistic with creedmoor recoil that will require a charge weight less than 37gr. If that is possible, and if the increase in pressure has no associated degradation in precision, then it could be something.
Of course not needing prc velocity I still think this would be more interesting in a grendel than a creedmoor. And perhaps some of the “straight wall” cartridges.
$70 a box for 308 is bad math for me.imo the ultimate game changing caliber I hear is coming will be the 308.
MSPR must have got me with the $70 a box.Yeah if it gets to that price point for 308 it’ll be for hunting only for most I’m guessing, just shoot the regular stuff for the most part but that option even existing is still cheaper than buying a separate rifle. Also if they follow suit of the creed then again, it’s game changing innovation imo.
Early prices on the 6.5 creed that’s up for preorders.
Yes. Opposite and equal forces being what they are, there’s no free lunch. If your bullet has more energy it’s pushing against your shoulder that much harder.If its the same volume of powder, but burning faster to hit the target pressure, is it actually more recoil?
I can definitely see a difference in recoil impulse trending snappier.
Be interesting to hear from folks that have loaded faster powders vs slower powders at similar charges. Maybe the silhouette crowd?