.480 Ruger - Why didn’t it catch on?

I think this is the answer. Practically doesn’t seem to matter with most big bore fans and the more powerful the better. I care about tradeoffs, but the market seems not to.

The .480's a cool round for the reasons you mentioned. That said, for your application, I'd personally go with a .45LC in a revolver that handled well for me, to balance out shootability and ballistics. The stuff @Chris in TN was talking about. You're really not giving up much at all with the .45LC to the .480, accuracy would improve a bit, and you get the extra round. Along with a lot better selection in bullets for different jobs. But if you handload, you could shoot the .480 by the bucket full by coming up with some low-recoil training loads, like with Trailboss or the like, and mitigate the shootability stuff while you bring your skills with the gun up.
 
The .480's a cool round for the reasons you mentioned. That said, for your application, I'd personally go with a .45LC in a revolver that handled well for me, to balance out shootability and ballistics. The stuff @Chris in TN was talking about. You're really not giving up much at all with the .45LC to the .480, accuracy would improve a bit, and you get the extra round. Along with a lot better selection in bullets for different jobs. But if you handload, you could shoot the .480 by the bucket full by coming up with some low-recoil training loads, like with Trailboss or the like, and mitigate the shootability stuff while you bring your skills with the gun up.
Good post!

For the extra round point, I believe the SRH is 6 rounds.
 
Practically doesn’t seem to matter with most big bore fans

Think about this - the design parameters for the .45 lc were that it be able to repeatedly fully ventilate a horse at (i believe) 50 yards. That was a black powder load, 250ish grains at 850ish fps. In the 1800's, when being able reliably stop a horse was a very real military consideration, that was deemed adequate. They could have easily made it more powerful but elected not to, because that was enough.

So when you look at .480 ruger, there are lots of things going against it. For most of what it can do, the much more prevalent .44 magnum can do equally well or some cases better. For pecker measuring, there are bigger and more powerful options.

Its a commercialized .475 linebaugh which is super cool. On paper it checks a box. Big bore, enough horsepower to fully penetrate anything, fits in a "normal" sized revolver, lower recoil than the nuclear stuff. Its just that nobody needs that. Its a stab at practicality in a very unpractical market space.
 
Looking into handgun calibers for hunting and bear defense and the .480 Ruger just seems absolutely perfect for most everything while still being relatively controllable.

Why is it not more successful?
Ignoring the defense and do-it-all arguments, the answer to this is really pretty simple. I used to know several people who hunted big game with handgun, but don’t personally know anyone who does this today. That is because handgun hunting got pushed into muzzleloader seasons in most states and inline muzzleloaders have taken that over. Few people will bother with handguns or traditional roundball muzzleloaders when you can use a modern inline to take game at longer distances with relatively little practice compared to the other options. Revolvers are also a relatively small market amongst handguns these days and big magnums are a smaller slice of that. So the market economics just aren’t there to support a lot of hard-recoiling >.44 magnum options.
 
Genuinely what does it do that cheaper, more readily available, more easily reloaded pre-existing cartridges didn't?

The only way for new handgun super-magnums to see any wide spread popularity is by being the new most powerful. Kind of like how skunks pelts are one of the most stable priced furs. The novelty is the only thing selling it. Anyone using a big magnum for practical purposes will just buy a .44mag or .454cas.
 
Back
Top