450/500cc vs big bore atv

I've ridden the bigger ones but only owned the 400 Honda and currently the 500 Polaris Sportsman.
More power is nice...but it seems wasted unless you tow heavy stuff....I have never felt the need for more power with my 400/500's.

Must haves IMO; Power steering, independent suspension

One consideration; The extra power doesn't really hurt you except that those units are a lot heavier which is a factor sometimes horsing them around.
 
Consider the rack capacity. The Can Am racks are excellent for strapping gear and meat. The 500 racks are slightly smaller.
 
I don't think you would regret going with a 700. Likely overkill in a lot of cases but having headroom is nice. I have a Yamaha 700 and have family with multiple 450-500s (not yamaha), and the 450-500s will get you where you are going but they can bog down if you are pulling or carrying more than a few hundred lbs... but I have drug an elk whole + 3 people up a mtn. on a small trailer with my 700. Have also carried a deer + 2 people on the unit itself, or a quartered elk + 2 people on the unit.

Transporting yourself and a quartered critter, a 450 will get it done. If you want to pull a decent bit of weight or carry multiple people, a 700 will do better.

Gearing also is important.

Also, physical size isn't that much different between the two.

Have fun!
 
I've done 65 mph on my 570SP with myself (#200) and another #100 of gear. I didn't and won't ever need to go that fast. On the trail, I never have an issue being underpowered.

Something to consider is the 4wd engagement system. Can Am uses a slip engage system. The front wheels spin a rotation or two before suddenly engaging. The Polaris system is on-demand. Once the switch is flipped, the front differential engages.
 
The right/best answer really depends on how to you plan to use the machine and what type of terrain and conditions you would expect to use it in.

For my intended uses, the bigger machines have far more checks in the "cons" column as compared to the "pros." As others have noted, the main advantages the bigger quads have over the smaller is load carrying and towing capacity. I would add clearance and weight, the latter of which is an advantage if crossing deep, fast rivers, but a massive disadvantage in many other situations and types of terrain.

I think a 450 (400-500) really hits the sweet spot for an ATV. Big enough to haul you and as much gear/meat as a personal could reasonably want to, but small enough that you can wiggle it into and out of just about anywhere and manage it by yourself. Throw a winch on the front and some ATP Mudlite tires on it and you have got, what I think is the ultimate access and tool, at least here in Alaska.

The smaller machines don't get stuck as easily, and if they do, they are much easier to get unstuck. They are a lot easier to manage on steep, loose, off-camber terrain. They get better fuel economy that their larger counterparts. They fit through places that ****** machines won't such as some of the pedestrian/railroad bridges. Trailering them is easier.

I have no need or interest to go fast. Not really possible in most of the places I wind up.

The main limitation I run into with the smaller machines is crossing deep, fast rivers. The bigger machines definitely handle those with a little more comfort with higher clearance and more weight to keep them in contact with the bottom. That having been said, if the crossing is deep enough that I can't do it with my machine, I usually wouldn't consider it even with a bigger machine.

I've spent a ton of time on Honda's (400-450 Ranchers and Foreman) and Yamahas (Grizzlys and Kodiaks 450 & 700) and would recommend either. No major issues with any of them. IRS is your friend in rough terrain. Heated grips are a must if using in all seasons.

"What is the best offroad vehicle for Alaska" is a debate held many times daily I am sure. For me it is the one that opens up as many types of terrain or as much access as possible rather than a vehicle choice that might be really capable, but only for a specific application or type of terrain.

I currently have a pair of Grizzly 450s and have had them loaded up with gear on the racks while towing a trailer stuffed full of moose meat many times and they had no problem handling that.

The little quads, in my opinion, will get you more places than any other option.

The 6-wheeled sit on tops like the Big Boss are quite popular and strike a pretty good balance between a lot of the different considerations. A 6-wheeled SxS with tracks is very versatile and capable as well, but $$$. Sherps are pretty BA but impractical for most.
 
Back
Top