Jason277
WKR
Roll call , who shoots a 270 wsm / 6.8 western? Going down a rabbit hole here ! Thank you in advance!
As of know Winchester is the only one. ADG is work on it and hopefully get it in the market soon.Seems like I hear there isn’t a good brass manufacturer out there?
Unknown munitions has this on their ADG brass page. Expected ship date 8/14/2024. Which was updated from last I looked a few months back.If you get one, you can get onto a waitlist for ADG brass in 6.8 Western which should be out the first quarter of 2025.
This would be welcome news! I've had good results with ADG brass in my 300PRC.Unknown munitions has this on their ADG brass page. Expected ship date 8/14/2024. Which was updated from last I looked a few months back.
I’m hopeful for this year but won’t be surprised if it didn’t get to the market till next year. Then I’ll have to work harder at finding that tikka doner.This would be welcome news! I've had good results with ADG brass in my 300PRC.
My last message from Kevin at ADG was back in April: "Good news first. We are going to manufacture 6.8WSTN. Unfortunately, a date has not been set for our first full production run. It will most likely be Q1 of 2025 (schedules are subject to change). "
Twist rate is the big reason. 270wsm is 1:10 and 6.8w is 1:8 per saami. The 270 might not be able to stabilize the heavies.Curious, if you're intending to shoot the heavy for caliber 270 bullets in the 160-175 range which to my understanding is what Winchester intended with their new 6.8 Western why would you switch from the larger case capacity 270 WSM to the smaller case capacity 6.8W especially if you're going to be shooting the heavy for caliber 270 bullets??
There's not a huge difference in case capacity between the two but for shooting the heavies I'd personally want the one with more case capacity. Even if I had to neck down ADG or Lapua 300 WSM brass so I could use top quality brass I'd still opt for the WSM over the Western but that's me and we all don't see things the same but I am curious why anyone would go Western over WSM.
I guess if you wanted factory ammo with heavier 270 bullets I could see why since I'm not sure anyone loads any of the 160-175 class bullets in factory 270WSM ammo.
Right, I get that but I was thinking more in the sense of if someone were to rebarrel one or build a custom or semi custom why would you not do a fast twist 270 WSM versus the 6.8 WesternTwist rate is the big reason. 270wsm is 1:10 and 6.8w is 1:8 per saami. The 270 might not be able to stabilize the heavies.
As stated above, the standard spec 270 WSM has a twist too slow for long (heavy) bullets. If you go custom 270 WSM you could certainly get it done. You'd want to have a faster twist barrel and a custom long throat chamber too so that you are not seating the bullet deep into the case thereby negating the larger capacity of the 270 WSM vs 6.8 Western. At that point you will not be able to use a short action and will need a longer standard or mid action. The 6.8 Western is the easy button for factory rifles if you want to shoot heavy.Curious, if you're intending to shoot the heavy for caliber 270 bullets in the 160-175 range which to my understanding is what Winchester intended with their new 6.8 Western why would you switch from the larger case capacity 270 WSM to the smaller case capacity 6.8W especially if you're going to be shooting the heavy for caliber 270 bullets??
There's not a huge difference in case capacity between the two but for shooting the heavies I'd personally want the one with more case capacity. Even if I had to neck down ADG or Lapua 300 WSM brass so I could use top quality brass I'd still opt for the WSM over the Western but that's me and we all don't see things the same but I am curious why anyone would go Western over WSM.
I guess if you wanted factory ammo with heavier 270 bullets I could see why since I'm not sure anyone loads any of the 160-175 class bullets in factory 270WSM ammo.
I was thinking along the lines of if using a factory action Tikka would be a good candidate or even a short action Rem 700 with a 3.100 Baney mag box would accommodate a fast twist long throated 270 WSM with the heavies even the very long Berger 170. I've always thought a SA 270 WSM build slinging those Berger 170's would make for a pretty sweet and potent long range hammer, especially, for the folks that are partial to 270's.As stated above, the standard spec 270 WSM has a twist too slow for long (heavy) bullets. If you go custom 270 WSM you could certainly get it done. You'd want to have a faster twist barrel and a custom long throat chamber too so that you are not seating the bullet deep into the case thereby negating the larger capacity of the 270 WSM vs 6.8 Western. At that point you will not be able to use a short action and will need a longer standard or mid action. The 6.8 Western is the easy button for factory rifles if you want to shoot heavy.
I remember Kirby Allen used to do a couple different hot rod wildcat 270's that would probably be pretty cool with the Berger 170's. One of them was a necked down RUM case to 270 and the other was his version of a 270 Lapua Improved I think he called it something like a 277 Allen mag or something like that. They didn't have the 170 Berger back then and if I recall he was using some custom made 169.5gr 270 bullets but he was sending them downrange at warp speed.I shoot a 270WSM. It's got a 1-9 twist benchmark barrel and it's a Remington 700 long action. I shoot the 170 EOL at 3050.
I use Norma brass currently. I think there are probably a few better offerings now.
Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk