.223 for bear, mountain goat, deer, elk, and moose.

The guy who does the Chopping Block and ARFCOM gel tests on youtube is telling me that if bullets like the 65gr Gameking and 77gr TMK are performing differently in animals than the way they woefully underpenetrate in his tests, I must be gut shooting deer with grandpappys mini 14.

Mind you the tests are shot like 2 feet from the block, which is fine if you have a focus on self defense, but even from an 11" barrel, you're gonna get more than 13-14" penetration from a 77gr TMK at 2500 fps or like 10.5 inches from a 65gr Gameking at 2773 fps. Thats over 100 yards if you start it from a rifle barrel (vs carbine)

You can't make this stuff up.

What would I have done without guys like this to "educate" me on real world bullet performance haha
 
Anybody have 10-12 rounds of black hills Tmk’s they’re willing to sell me? Thanks

It’s better to just buy 50!

 
The guy who does the Chopping Block and ARFCOM gel tests on youtube is telling me that if bullets like the 65gr Gameking and 77gr TMK are performing differently in animals than the way they woefully underpenetrate in his tests, I must be gut shooting deer with grandpappys mini 14.


You can't make this stuff up.

What would I have done without guys like this to "educate" me on real world bullet performance haha

Doesn’t he perform tests at 15 yards or something not pertinent to hunting scenarios? I prefer a 100 yard gel test. Or at least 50.
 
Doesn’t he perform tests at 15 yards or something not pertinent to hunting scenarios? I prefer a 100 yard gel test. Or at least 50.

Its like 2 feet lol but velocity is velocity.

What distance is a 77gr gonna be at 2500 fps considering the speed at which many of us start them at? Or a 65gr Gameking at 2773? Getting well under a foot of penetration?

Shoot a deer/pig at 75 yards with a Gameking and get 10 inches of penetration? I dunno man. They exit from what I see. 77gr TMK often do too...I'd see maybe a 69 getting 14" of penetration and rarely exiting broadside deer at 2500 FPS but if anyone has shot em more than me I'd stand corrected.


That said I understand. Makes sense cause he does stuff with defensive shooting in mind but guys who shoot hunting bullets that close...yeah, no thanks
 
Penetration isn’t necessarily the goal here. Its really the wound profile that is more important. A short neck,then a massive wound cavity that encompasses the vitals. Because these bullets upset so reliably they have a tendency to turn the temporary wound cavity into a permanent wound cavity because of the fragments. This is a good thing. It means that the interior is a mess even if the bullet doesn’t exit.

This is a screen grab from another thread and is showing the profile of a different bullet, but you get the idea. The interior, from just barely inside to the offside, is a massive mess of goo. Even if the bullet ‘only gets 10” of penetration’. How wide is a deer?
IMG_0144.png
 
Penetration isn’t necessarily the goal here. Its really the wound profile that is more important. A short neck,then a massive wound cavity that encompasses the vitals. Because these bullets upset so reliably they have a tendency to turn the temporary wound cavity into a permanent wound cavity because of the fragments. This is a good thing. It means that the interior is a mess even if the bullet doesn’t exit.

This is a screen grab from another thread and is showing the profile of a different bullet, but you get the idea. The interior, from just barely inside to the offside, is a massive mess of goo. Even if the bullet ‘only gets 10” of penetration’. How wide is a deer?
View attachment 1037358

Respectfully, I know that. And never stated or implied that penetration is a goal or what we are looking for from these bullets.

Regardless of if its the goal or not, the point I was getting at was "does it behave like that in an animal (vs the gel) or does it behave differently"?
 
Back
Top