35WhelenAI
WKR
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2021
- Messages
- 1,553
1) Those hunters were unthinking and looking for a video in their pursuit, what happened with that cartridge has little to do with a cartridge and everything to do with them choosing to let off a shot on that bear. They owned it, a credit to them on that. Yet, stars in their eyes clouded their judgment even with the "experience" they represent. The fact it didn't cross their mind while in the field says a lot about what many folks do but will not own up to with any rifle.Really? Can you point out the “good points” that are rooted in fact and not an abbreviated attempt at discrediting something using fallacy and no first hand experience?
2) The .223 debate does discount larger calibers as not necessary and paints the shade of being less effective on-game. Dead is dead, Wound pictures are just that, pictures of a dead animal. Lord, I wish I had taken pictures of the vitals for the last 30 years with my larger caliber rifles, and the other harvests I've been part of.
3) There are many hunters that fit the description of not being seasoned in the field they are hunting. I meet them each year. They have hunted deer as their main big game and now they are hunting elk in the mountain west for one week every other year or less frequently.
4) When following the advice of a smaller caliber frangible bullet, when faced with a shot at a less than ideal angle, will they pass on a shot? Will the .223 with the 77 TMK unequivocally reach the vitals from the same angles as a 6.5/.270/7mm/.308 caliber/.358 caliber on the same apples to apples shot presentation?
Those are good points he made. Whether you agree or disagree, they show a side of the discussion and he backed them.