I think he's painting the entire thread with one pronoun.
It's obvious he skimmed the thread, but didn't read it thoroughly.
Anytime you have a body of evidence across multiple platforms, multiple shooters, multiple scenarios and using multiple projectiles of the same diameter and of varying construction taking game of the variety posted within, it's hard to argue with the facts.
I will be the first to admit, I started this thread with a healthy dose of skepticism, but slowly began to morph from skeptic to believer, not so much because of the bullet itself, it was the number of and skill level of the various shooters, their variety of platforms, their different bullet choices and the varying scenarios.
This thread has the pitfall of TLDR, so they skim and amongst the naysayers, they miss some relevant posts.
It took me 11 days to thoroughly read this thread, decipher the pertinent information and come to my own conclusion. Most people cannot stay focused 11 minutes much less 11 days.